- JD Vance 2028 campaign
- Charlie Kirk death exploitation
- Enthrone JD Vance 2028
- Trump successor JD Vance
- Vance Kirk relationship 2025
They are going to use Charlie Kirk’s death relentlessly to shill for JD Vance in 2028.
That’s clearly why Vance jumped in front of this from the beginning by carrying Kirk’s casket and hosting his show.
They are doing absolutely everything to enthrone him as trump’s successor.
— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) September 21, 2025
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
In a controversial tweet by Nicholas J. Fuentes, he predicts that Charlie Kirk’s death will be exploited to benefit JD Vance’s potential presidential campaign in 2028. Fuentes suggests that Vance strategically inserted himself into the narrative surrounding Kirk’s passing by carrying his casket and hosting his show. This move, according to Fuentes, is part of a larger scheme to position Vance as the successor to former President Donald Trump.
The tweet, posted on September 21, 2025, has sparked a debate among social media users, with many questioning the ethics and morality of using a tragic event for political gain. Fuentes’ assertion that Vance is capitalizing on Kirk’s death to further his own political ambitions has been met with both outrage and skepticism.
It is important to note that Fuentes is a controversial figure himself, known for his far-right views and inflammatory rhetoric. His prediction about Vance’s alleged exploitation of Kirk’s death should be taken with a grain of salt, given his history of making provocative statements.
Despite the controversy surrounding Fuentes’ tweet, it raises important questions about the intersection of politics and tragedy. The idea that politicians may use a person’s death for their own benefit is not a new one, but Fuentes’ explicit prediction adds a new dimension to the discussion.
In the world of politics, image and perception are critical. The way a politician handles a crisis or tragedy can have a significant impact on their public image and future prospects. Vance’s actions following Kirk’s death, as perceived by Fuentes, could shape the narrative around his potential presidential campaign.
It is worth considering the ethical implications of using a tragedy for political gain. Exploiting someone’s death for personal or political benefit is a deeply troubling practice that can erode trust in politicians and the political system as a whole. Fuentes’ tweet serves as a reminder of the importance of integrity and empathy in the realm of politics.
As the 2028 presidential election approaches, the tactics and strategies employed by candidates will come under increased scrutiny. If Vance does decide to run for president, his handling of Kirk’s death and the ensuing fallout will undoubtedly be a topic of discussion.
In conclusion, Nicholas J. Fuentes’ tweet raises provocative questions about the intersection of politics and tragedy. The idea that JD Vance may be using Charlie Kirk’s death to further his own political ambitions is a disturbing one, highlighting the ethical challenges faced by politicians in navigating sensitive situations. As the political landscape continues to evolve, it is essential for politicians to prioritize integrity and compassion in their actions and decisions. Only time will tell how Vance’s alleged exploitation of Kirk’s death will impact his political future.
They are going to use Charlie Kirk’s death relentlessly to shill for JD Vance in 2028.
That’s clearly why Vance jumped in front of this from the beginning by carrying Kirk’s casket and hosting his show.
They are doing absolutely everything to enthrone him as Trump’s successor.
— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) September 21, 2025
In September 2025, a tweet by Nicholas J. Fuentes sparked controversy when he suggested that there was a plan to use Charlie Kirk’s death to promote JD Vance as Trump’s successor in the 2028 election. Fuentes claimed that Vance had strategically positioned himself by carrying Kirk’s casket and hosting his show, all in an effort to solidify his path to the presidency.
The Controversial Tweet:
Fuentes’ tweet raised eyebrows and ignited a debate about the lengths to which political figures will go to secure power. The idea of using a tragedy like Kirk’s death for personal gain seemed distasteful to many, prompting discussions about ethics and morality in the political arena.
Exploiting a Tragic Loss:
The notion that Vance would exploit Kirk’s death for political advantage is a troubling one. It raises questions about the sincerity of his actions and whether his motives are truly in the best interest of the country. Using someone’s passing as a stepping stone to power is a tactic that has been criticized time and time again in the world of politics.
Vance’s Calculated Moves:
Vance’s decision to actively involve himself in the aftermath of Kirk’s death raises suspicions about his intentions. By positioning himself as a key figure in the mourning process and hosting Kirk’s show, Vance could be seen as attempting to capitalize on the situation for his own benefit. This calculated move could be interpreted as a strategic ploy to gain favor with voters and establish himself as the heir to Trump’s legacy.
The Race for Succession:
The prospect of Vance succeeding Trump in 2028 is a contentious topic within political circles. With the former president still looming large in the republican Party, many are eager to see who will step up to fill his shoes. Vance’s close association with Trump and his efforts to align himself with the former president’s base suggest that he is positioning himself as a frontrunner in the race for succession.
Ethical Considerations:
The ethical implications of using a tragedy like Kirk’s death for political gain cannot be ignored. It calls into question the integrity of those involved and raises concerns about their true intentions. Politics is already a cutthroat arena, but exploiting a loss for personal advancement takes things to a whole new level.
The Road to 2028:
As the political landscape continues to shift and evolve, the race for the 2028 election is already heating up. With figures like JD Vance making strategic moves to position themselves as potential successors to Trump, the stakes are higher than ever. The American public will have to navigate a complex web of allegiances and motivations as they decide who will lead them into the future.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the use of Charlie Kirk’s death to promote JD Vance as Trump’s successor speaks to larger issues of ethics and integrity in politics. The idea that a tragedy could be exploited for personal gain is a troubling one, and it raises important questions about the lengths to which individuals will go to achieve power. As the 2028 election approaches, the American public will have to carefully consider the actions and motivations of those vying for the highest office in the land.
Charlie Kirk death, JD Vance 2028, political shilling, Trump successor, Vance campaign, political strategy, Kirk funeral, conservative movement, political manipulation, media coverage, political allegiance, presidential hopeful, political tactics, public perception, political maneuvering, political ambition, political influence, political agenda, political power, political tactics