1. Gavin Newsom Secret Service threat assessment
2. Gavin Newsom press office statement
3. Kristi Noem bad day America
4. Zero tolerance direct implicit threats
5. Newsom office referral Secret Service

BREAKING: Gavin Newsom’s press office referred to the Secret Service for “full threat assessment” after they made this statement.

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

“Kristi Noem is going to have a bad day today. You’re welcome, America,” Newsom’s office said.

“We have zero tolerance for direct or implicit… pic.twitter.com/X9uEQkeQqC

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 20, 2025

In a shocking turn of events, Gavin Newsom’s press office has referred the Secret Service for a “full threat assessment” after a statement was made regarding Kristi Noem. The statement, which read, “Kristi Noem is going to have a bad day today. You’re welcome, America,” has raised concerns and prompted swift action from Newsom’s office.

The tweet containing this controversial statement was shared by Eric Daugherty on September 20, 2025. The tweet quickly gained traction on social media, sparking a wave of reactions and discussions online. The implications of such a statement, especially in the current political climate, are significant and have not gone unnoticed.

Newsom’s office has made it clear that they have “zero tolerance for direct or implicit threats,” and will not take this situation lightly. The decision to involve the Secret Service highlights the seriousness of the matter and the need to ensure the safety and security of all individuals involved.

The feud between Newsom and Noem is no secret, with tensions running high between the two politicians. This latest development only adds fuel to the fire and raises questions about the nature of their relationship and the potential consequences of their ongoing conflict.

As the story continues to unfold, it is important to consider the implications of such statements and the impact they can have on public discourse and political discourse. The role of social media in amplifying these messages and shaping public opinion cannot be understated, and it is crucial to approach these situations with caution and responsibility.

In conclusion, the statement made by Newsom’s office has sparked controversy and raised concerns about the safety and security of individuals involved. The decision to involve the Secret Service for a threat assessment underscores the gravity of the situation and the need for swift action. As the story develops, it is important to monitor the situation closely and consider the broader implications of such statements in today’s political landscape.

In a recent development that has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, Gavin Newsom’s press office has referred to the Secret Service for a “full threat assessment” after a startling statement was made. The statement in question, attributed to Newsom’s office, reads: “Kristi Noem is going to have a bad day today. You’re welcome, America.” This bold declaration has raised eyebrows and sparked concerns about the safety and security of those involved.

The implications of such a statement are significant, as any mention of a “bad day” in connection with a public figure like Kristi Noem can be interpreted as a potential threat. Newsom’s office’s decision to involve the Secret Service underscores the seriousness of the situation and highlights the need for swift and decisive action in response to perceived threats.

The use of language that suggests harm or ill-will towards an individual, particularly a political figure, is not taken lightly in today’s climate of heightened security and awareness. The zero-tolerance policy for direct or implicit threats, as stated by Newsom’s office, reflects a commitment to ensuring the safety and well-being of all individuals involved in the political sphere.

It is important to note that statements like these can have far-reaching consequences, not only for the individuals directly involved but also for the broader public and political landscape. The potential for misunderstanding or misinterpretation of such statements underscores the need for clear and responsible communication in all interactions, particularly those involving public figures and sensitive issues.

In light of these recent developments, it is crucial for all individuals to exercise caution and discretion when engaging in political discourse or making statements that could be perceived as threatening or inflammatory. The involvement of law enforcement agencies like the Secret Service serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining a safe and respectful environment for all individuals, regardless of their political affiliations or beliefs.

As news of this incident continues to unfold, it will be important to monitor the response from all parties involved and to consider the broader implications for political discourse and public safety. The need for open and honest communication, coupled with a commitment to civility and respect, is essential in fostering a healthy and productive political environment for all individuals.

In conclusion, the recent statement made by Gavin Newsom’s press office, which has prompted a “full threat assessment” by the Secret Service, highlights the need for caution and responsible communication in all interactions, especially those involving public figures and sensitive issues. The zero-tolerance policy for threats, whether direct or implicit, underscores the importance of maintaining a safe and respectful environment for all individuals involved in the political sphere. It is crucial for all individuals to be mindful of the impact of their words and actions on others and to strive for open and honest communication in all interactions.

Gavin Newsom, press office, Secret Service, threat assessment, Kristi Noem, bad day, zero tolerance, America, statement, full investigation, security risk, political threat, government response, security protocol, official statement, potential danger, security breach, safety measures, national security, urgent situation