1. California immunization law 2025
2. Gov Newsom vaccine mandate
3. Big Pharma influence in politics
4. RFK Jr vaccine controversy
5. State vs federal immunization guidelines

NEW: “Governor Gavin Newsom just signed a new law breaking from decades of federal CDC guidance — The Governor‘s new law gives the Golden state the power to set its own immunization schedules”

Democrats are FULLY owned by Big Pharma, this allows California to ignore RFK Jr… pic.twitter.com/JFNLBhlRWj

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) September 20, 2025

Governor Gavin Newsom has recently signed a new law in California that breaks away from decades of federal CDC guidance. This new law grants the Golden State the authority to establish its own immunization schedules, marking a significant departure from previous regulations.

The move has sparked controversy, with some critics accusing Democrats of being in the pocket of Big Pharma. They argue that this new law allows California to disregard the opinions of prominent figures like RFK Jr., who have been vocal opponents of certain vaccination practices.

This development highlights the ongoing debate surrounding vaccination policies and the role of government in regulating public health. Proponents of the new law argue that it gives California the flexibility to tailor immunization schedules to the specific needs of its population, potentially leading to better health outcomes.

On the other hand, opponents fear that this shift in power could lead to a weakening of national vaccination standards and put public health at risk. They argue that federal guidelines are in place for a reason and should not be disregarded lightly.

Overall, Governor Newsom’s decision to sign this new law reflects the complex interplay between state and federal authority in matters of public health. It remains to be seen how this move will impact vaccination rates and health outcomes in California, as well as the broader national conversation on immunization policies.

In a groundbreaking move, Governor Gavin Newsom has just signed a new law that breaks from decades of federal CDC guidance, giving California the power to set its own immunization schedules. This decision has sparked controversy and debate, with some accusing Democrats of being fully owned by Big Pharma. This law allows California to ignore the recommendations of prominent figures like RFK Jr.

The signing of this new law represents a significant shift in how immunization schedules are determined in the Golden State. By breaking away from federal CDC guidance, California now has the autonomy to establish its own policies regarding vaccinations. This move has raised questions about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the political landscape.

Critics argue that allowing California to set its own immunization schedules gives Big Pharma undue influence over public health policy. They claim that Democrats are too closely aligned with pharmaceutical companies, putting profits over the well-being of the population. This has led to concerns about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, as well as the potential for conflicts of interest in decision-making processes.

On the other hand, supporters of the new law argue that it gives California the flexibility to tailor immunization schedules to the specific needs of its population. By allowing the state to set its own guidelines, policymakers can take into account local factors and considerations that may not be addressed by federal recommendations. This could lead to more targeted and effective vaccination strategies that better protect public health.

RFK Jr., a vocal critic of vaccine policies, has been a prominent figure in the debate over immunization schedules. His views on vaccines and their potential risks have garnered both support and criticism. With California now able to disregard his recommendations, the state has the opportunity to chart its own course on vaccination policies.

The signing of this new law by Governor Newsom has implications not just for California, but for the broader national conversation on public health and vaccine policy. It raises questions about the balance of power between state and federal authorities, as well as the influence of special interest groups on decision-making processes.

As the debate continues to unfold, it is clear that the issue of immunization schedules is a complex and multifaceted one. It touches on questions of public health, individual rights, and the role of government in safeguarding the well-being of its citizens. With California now able to set its own guidelines, the state is poised to take a leading role in shaping the future of vaccine policy in the United States.

In conclusion, the signing of this new law by Governor Gavin Newsom represents a significant departure from traditional approaches to immunization schedules. By giving California the power to set its own guidelines, the state is taking a bold step towards greater autonomy and flexibility in public health policy. While the move has sparked controversy and debate, it also presents an opportunity for California to lead the way in developing more targeted and effective vaccination strategies. As the implications of this decision continue to unfold, it is clear that the debate over immunization schedules is far from over.

Governor Gavin Newsom, California law, federal CDC guidance, immunization schedules, Golden State, Big Pharma, RFK Jr, Democrats, new legislation, public health, vaccine mandates, healthcare policy, state autonomy, medical freedom, public safety, healthcare regulations, vaccination laws, policy changes, government authority, public health crisis