
UNT negligence, Student protest UNT, Charlie Kirk assassination, UNT controversy, Radical mob UNT.
BREAKING: I’m demanding answers from UNT for kicking a student out of class for denouncing the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
UNT has protected terrorist sympathizers and punished the brave student who stood up to the radical mob. It must answer for its apparent negligence. pic.twitter.com/uBxiHIF8ND
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) September 19, 2025
The Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton, took to Twitter to demand answers from the University of North Texas (UNT) for reportedly kicking a student out of class for denouncing the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. In a tweet, Paxton accused UNT of protecting terrorist sympathizers and punishing the brave student who stood up to the radical mob. He called for the university to be held accountable for what he described as negligence.
The incident has sparked controversy and debate online, with many people expressing support for the student and criticizing UNT for its actions. Some have accused the university of stifling free speech and siding with those who condone violence.
It is unclear what exactly led to the student being removed from class, but Paxton’s tweet suggests that the student was targeted for speaking out against the assassination of Kirk. The conservative commentator is known for his controversial views and has been the target of threats and protests in the past.
Paxton’s demand for answers from UNT comes at a time when tensions are high on college campuses across the country, with debates over free speech, political correctness, and the role of universities in shaping public discourse.
As the story continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how UNT responds to Paxton’s allegations and whether the university will take any action to address the concerns raised by the Attorney General. In the meantime, this incident serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges facing students and faculty who dare to speak out against the status quo.

BREAKING: I’m demanding answers from UNT for kicking a student out of class for denouncing the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
UNT has protected terrorist sympathizers and punished the brave student who stood up to the radical mob. It must answer for its apparent negligence. pic.twitter.com/uBxiHIF8ND
— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) September 19, 2025
In a recent social media post, Attorney General Ken Paxton raised concerns about the University of North Texas (UNT) for allegedly kicking a student out of class for denouncing the assassination of Charlie Kirk. This incident has sparked outrage and calls for answers from UNT regarding their handling of the situation.
The breaking news surrounding this issue has shed light on the complexities of free speech on college campuses and the importance of protecting students’ rights to express their opinions, even if they may be controversial. The student in question showed bravery by standing up to what was described as a radical mob, which raises questions about UNT’s commitment to fostering an environment of open dialogue and diverse perspectives.
As the story continues to unfold, it is crucial for UNT to address the allegations of protecting terrorist sympathizers and punishing the student for exercising their right to freedom of speech. This situation highlights the need for universities to uphold their responsibility to provide a safe and inclusive environment for all students, regardless of their beliefs or opinions.
Attorney General Paxton’s demand for answers from UNT underscores the importance of accountability and transparency in higher education institutions. Students should feel empowered to speak out against injustice and engage in meaningful discussions without fear of retribution or censorship.
The implications of this incident go beyond the confines of UNT and serve as a reminder of the broader challenges facing universities in upholding the principles of free speech and academic freedom. It raises questions about the role of universities in shaping the minds of future leaders and the responsibility they bear in promoting a culture of respect and tolerance.
As the public awaits a response from UNT, it is essential for the university to address the concerns raised by Attorney General Paxton and the community at large. Transparency and accountability are key in rebuilding trust and ensuring that incidents like this do not happen again in the future.
In conclusion, the breaking news of a student being kicked out of class for denouncing the assassination of Charlie Kirk has sparked a national conversation about free speech, academic freedom, and the role of universities in shaping the minds of young adults. UNT must address the allegations of protecting terrorist sympathizers and punishing the brave student who stood up to the radical mob. The university’s response will be a test of its commitment to upholding the values of diversity, inclusion, and freedom of speech.
University of North Texas, student rights, campus controversy, free speech, academic freedom, student protest, Charlie Kirk, assassination denouncement, radical mob, negligence, accountability, academic integrity, protest rights, campus activism, student discipline, terrorism sympathizers, student activism, campus injustice, higher education, student voice