media accountability, political discourse, misinformation regulation, news bias, freedom of speech

Trump: “When you have a network and you have evening shows and all they do is hit trump… They’re licensed. They’re not allowed to do that.”

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

We CANNOT normalize this.

HE IS NOT GOING TO STOP. pic.twitter.com/OTAylLXUYo

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) September 18, 2025

Summary of Gavin Newsom’s Response to Trump’s Statement on Media Coverage

In a recent Twitter post, Gavin Newsom, the Governor of California, addressed a statement made by former President Donald Trump regarding media coverage. Trump expressed his dissatisfaction with evening news shows that he claims are biased against him, asserting that they are "licensed" and suggesting that they should not engage in what he perceives as unfair criticism. Newsom responded emphatically, warning against the normalization of such rhetoric and asserting that Trump will not cease his attempts to undermine the media’s role in democracy.

Trump’s Statement on Media and Bias

In his statement, Trump articulated a grievance familiar to many of his supporters: the belief that mainstream media outlets are disproportionately critical of him. He stated, “When you have a network and you have evening shows and all they do is hit Trump… They’re licensed. They’re not allowed to do that.” This comment reflects a broader narrative that Trump has frequently promoted, portraying himself as a victim of unfair treatment by the media.

Trump’s assertion raises questions about the role of media in a democratic society. By claiming that news networks should not criticize him, he implicitly challenges the foundational principle of a free press, which is to hold public figures accountable regardless of their political affiliation.

Newsom’s Warning Against Normalization

Gavin Newsom’s response to Trump’s statement is a clarion call for vigilance against what he perceives as an alarming trend. He stated, "We CANNOT normalize this," emphasizing the importance of recognizing the dangers that such rhetoric poses to democratic institutions. Newsom’s use of capital letters underscores his urgency and concern, suggesting that the implications of Trump’s comments extend beyond mere political disagreement.

In his tweet, Newsom warns that Trump’s behavior is not likely to change, proclaiming, “HE IS NOT GOING TO STOP.” This indicates a belief that Trump’s approach to media and criticism will persist, potentially leading to further erosion of public trust in journalism and democratic norms. Newsom’s assertion serves as a rallying cry for those who believe in the importance of a robust and independent media landscape.

The Broader Implications of Trump’s Rhetoric

Trump’s statements and Newsom’s subsequent response highlight a significant divide in American political discourse. The former president’s characterization of the media as an adversary aligns with a broader populist narrative that seeks to delegitimize established institutions. Such rhetoric can have profound implications for public perception and trust in the media, potentially leading to increased polarization among the electorate.

Newsom’s response can be seen as an effort to counteract this trend by reinforcing the necessity of a critical and independent press. He calls for a collective acknowledgment of the dangers that arise when political figures seek to undermine the media’s role as a watchdog. By framing the situation in such stark terms, Newsom aims to galvanize public opinion against the normalization of anti-media sentiments.

The Role of Social Media in Political Discourse

The exchange between Trump and Newsom also exemplifies the impact of social media on political discourse. Platforms like Twitter allow for instantaneous communication and can amplify messages rapidly. Newsom’s tweet not only responds to Trump but also serves as a broader commentary on the state of political dialogue in the United States.

Social media has the power to shape narratives and influence public opinion. However, it can also contribute to the spread of misinformation and divisive rhetoric. Newsom’s warning against normalization is particularly relevant in this context, as social media can serve as a breeding ground for extremist views and anti-democratic sentiments.

Conclusion

The discourse surrounding Trump’s comments and Newsom’s response reflects a critical moment in American politics. As political figures navigate their relationships with the media, the importance of maintaining a free and independent press cannot be overstated. Newsom’s call to action serves as a reminder of the need to uphold democratic principles and resist the normalization of divisive rhetoric.

In an era where media criticism can be weaponized for political gain, the response from public officials like Newsom is vital. It encourages citizens to remain vigilant, to critically engage with media narratives, and to advocate for the preservation of democratic norms. Ultimately, the exchange serves as a poignant reminder of the ongoing struggle to protect the integrity of both the media and democratic discourse in the face of increasing challenges.