Owner celebrates fascist death, Lola’s Tacos concession, State Farm stadium
Boycott Lola’s Tacos, Arizona conservatives, State Farm stadium
Anti-conservative sentiment, Lola’s Tacos concession, State Farm stadium
Controversial statement, Lola’s Tacos owner, Arizona conservatives
State Farm stadium concession, Lola’s Tacos, fascist comment

The owner of Lola’s Tacos, who has a concession at state Farm stadium (the place where Charlie Kirk’s memorial will be held) celebrated his death stating

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

“One less fascist in this country.
Now on to the next one!”

AZ conservatives, do not eat here pic.twitter.com/po1ODK0w89

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

— Savanah Hernandez (@sav_says_) September 18, 2025

The owner of Lola’s Tacos, a concession at State Farm Stadium, made headlines recently for celebrating the death of conservative figure Charlie Kirk. In a tweet posted by Savanah Hernandez, the owner was quoted as saying, “One less fascist in this country. Now on to the next one!” This shocking statement has sparked outrage among Arizona conservatives, who are now calling for a boycott of Lola’s Tacos.

The controversy surrounding Lola’s Tacos began when news of Charlie Kirk’s memorial service being held at State Farm Stadium broke. As a prominent conservative figure, Kirk’s death was met with both mourning and celebration, depending on one’s political views. However, the owner of Lola’s Tacos took it a step further by openly celebrating Kirk’s death and calling for the demise of other conservatives.

This inflammatory statement has not gone unnoticed, as Arizona conservatives are now urging their fellow citizens to avoid eating at Lola’s Tacos. The call for a boycott has gained momentum on social media, with many expressing their disgust at the owner’s actions. In response, Lola’s Tacos has faced backlash from the community and is now dealing with the repercussions of their owner’s controversial remarks.

The incident has also raised questions about the role of politics in business and the importance of maintaining a neutral stance. While everyone is entitled to their own opinions and beliefs, publicly celebrating someone’s death is seen as crossing a line for many. The owner of Lola’s Tacos may have alienated a significant portion of their customer base, leading to potential financial consequences for the business.

In the age of social media, one’s words and actions can quickly spread and have lasting effects. The backlash against Lola’s Tacos serves as a reminder that businesses must be mindful of how their actions may be perceived by the public. In a politically charged climate, it is crucial for businesses to tread carefully and avoid alienating customers based on their beliefs.

As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how Lola’s Tacos will address the controversy and whether they will be able to recover from the backlash. Regardless of the outcome, this incident serves as a cautionary tale for businesses about the potential consequences of mixing politics with business. In a diverse and polarized society, it is essential for businesses to prioritize inclusivity and respect for all customers, regardless of their political beliefs.

In a recent tweet by Savanah Hernandez, the owner of Lola’s Tacos, who has a concession at State Farm stadium, made a shocking statement celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk. The tweet read, “One less fascist in this country. Now on to the next one!” This has sparked outrage among Arizona conservatives, who are now being urged not to eat at Lola’s Tacos. The controversy surrounding this statement has brought to light the importance of separating personal beliefs from business practices.

The statement made by the owner of Lola’s Tacos is not only disrespectful but also divisive. Celebrating the death of someone, regardless of their beliefs, is not only inhumane but also unethical. It goes against the very principles of respect and kindness that we should uphold in society. By openly expressing such sentiments, the owner of Lola’s Tacos has alienated a portion of their customer base and tarnished the reputation of their business.

It is important to remember that everyone is entitled to their own opinions and beliefs. However, when those beliefs infringe upon the rights and values of others, it becomes a problem. In this case, the owner of Lola’s Tacos has crossed a line by openly celebrating the death of an individual based on their political beliefs. This kind of behavior is not only unacceptable but also harmful to the community as a whole.

As members of society, we have a responsibility to treat others with kindness and respect, regardless of our differences. It is through understanding and compassion that we can build a stronger and more inclusive community. By boycotting establishments that promote hate and division, we can send a clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated.

In light of this incident, Arizona conservatives are being urged to refrain from eating at Lola’s Tacos. By choosing to support businesses that uphold values of respect and inclusivity, we can create a more positive and welcoming environment for everyone. It is important to hold businesses accountable for their actions and to stand up against hate and discrimination in all its forms.

In conclusion, the statement made by the owner of Lola’s Tacos is not only offensive but also harmful to the community. It is important for us to stand up against hate and division and to support businesses that promote values of respect and inclusivity. By coming together as a community, we can create a more positive and welcoming environment for all. Let us remember to treat others with kindness and compassion, and to always stand up for what is right.

Owner of Lola’s Tacos, State Farm stadium concession, Charlie Kirk memorial, Anti-conservative statement, Political controversy, Arizona restaurant, Public backlash, Social media outrage, Cancel culture, Political activism, Extremist views, Controversial remarks, Polarizing figure, Protest response, Freedom of speech, Political division, Ethical concerns, Social responsibility, Public image, Community boycott.