Jimmy Kimmel news, ABC network controversy, late-night show cancellation, Charlie Kirk incident, Nexstar affiliate changes

Disney’s ABC is canceling Jimmy Kimmel “indefinitely” after he lied that Charlie Kirk’s assassin was MAGA.

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

The decision comes just after ABC affiliates dropped Kimmel through Nexstar. pic.twitter.com/TN6bn17NUv

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) September 17, 2025

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

Jimmy Kimmel’s Indefinite Cancellation by Disney’s ABC: A Closer Look

In a surprising turn of events, Disney’s ABC network has decided to cancel "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" indefinitely. This decision comes in the wake of accusations against Kimmel for allegedly spreading misinformation regarding the identity of Charlie Kirk’s assassin, claiming that the individual was affiliated with the MAGA movement. The fallout from this controversy has been significant, particularly following the recent decision by ABC affiliates to drop Kimmel’s show through Nexstar.

The Controversy Explained

The controversy centers around a claim made by Jimmy Kimmel during an episode of his late-night talk show, where he suggested that the assassin of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk was connected to the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement. This assertion has been met with considerable backlash, particularly from conservative commentators and audiences who argue that Kimmel’s statement was not only misleading but also damaging to public discourse.

Kimmel’s comments sparked widespread outrage, leading to accusations of him engaging in "fake news" tactics to promote a narrative that aligns with his personal political views. Critics argue that such statements can further divide audiences and perpetuate misinformation, particularly in a politically charged environment.

ABC’s Response

In light of the backlash and the potential damage to its reputation, ABC has taken the drastic step of canceling Kimmel’s show "indefinitely." This move is perceived as a response to the growing discontent among viewers and affiliates alike. The timing of the cancellation is noteworthy, coming just after ABC affiliates made the decision to drop Kimmel’s show through Nexstar, a significant media company that operates a number of local television stations across the United States.

This strategic move by ABC could be seen as an effort to realign its programming and restore viewer trust. By distancing itself from Kimmel amid the controversy, ABC may be attempting to mitigate possible fallout and regain favor with its audience.

The Implications for Late-Night Television

The indefinite cancellation of "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" raises questions about the future of late-night television, particularly in a landscape that has become increasingly polarized. Late-night hosts often use their platforms to engage in political commentary, but Kimmel’s situation underscores the risks associated with crossing the line into misinformation.

As the media landscape continues to evolve, late-night shows may need to navigate these challenges more carefully. The incident serves as a reminder of the responsibilities that come with having a platform, as well as the potential consequences of straying from factual reporting.

Viewer Reactions

The public’s reaction to the cancellation has been mixed. Some viewers express support for ABC’s decision, believing that Kimmel’s comments were irresponsible and warranted a strong response. Others, however, view the cancellation as an infringement on free speech and an example of cancel culture at work. This divide reflects broader societal tensions regarding media, politics, and accountability.

Conclusion

As Disney’s ABC cancels "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" indefinitely due to controversy surrounding Kimmel’s statements about Charlie Kirk’s assassin, the implications of this decision extend beyond just one show. It highlights the delicate balance that late-night hosts must maintain when engaging in political discourse and the potential repercussions of spreading misinformation. As the media landscape continues to shift, it remains to be seen how this incident will influence future programming decisions and the overall climate of late-night television.

The cancellation serves as a pivotal moment in the ongoing conversation about the role of media in shaping public perception and the responsibilities of those who wield influence through their platforms.