innocent American citizens based on their political beliefs?" KASH: "Absolutely not. The FBI’s top priority is national security, not political agendas." JIM JORDAN: "Then why did the FBI ignore multiple warnings about the Parkland shooter? Why did they fail to stop the Boston Marathon bombers? Why did they spy on the Trump campaign? The American people deserve answers!" — School board meeting surveillance, FBI investigation, education policy Government oversight, parental rights, law enforcement tactics Public safety concerns, political controversy, federal agency actions

By | September 17, 2025
Fairgrounds Flip: Democrats Turned Republicans at Crawford! —  Flipping Voters at County Fairs, Trump Supporters Energized in Pennsylvania, Republican Momentum 2025

FBI surveillance, School board monitoring, Kash Patel interrogation, Democrat criticism, Government spying

In a recent exchange between Jim Jordan and Kash Patel, the former embarrassed every Democrat who has been smearing Patel’s performance at the FBI. The interaction took place during a congressional hearing where Jordan posed a series of rapid-fire questions to Patel, seeking clarification on various issues.

One of the key questions asked by Jordan was whether the FBI was still spying on parents at school board meetings. Patel’s response was a resounding “No, sir.” This response is significant as it addresses concerns raised by many parents who have been vocal about feeling targeted and surveilled by law enforcement agencies.

Jordan also inquired about whether the FBI was still targeting certain groups or individuals. Patel’s response to this question was not detailed in the tweet, but it is clear that Jordan was seeking to shed light on any potential misconduct or overreach by the FBI.

The exchange between Jordan and Patel highlights the ongoing scrutiny faced by law enforcement agencies, particularly in the wake of controversies surrounding surveillance practices and civil liberties. Patel’s responses suggest that steps have been taken to address some of these concerns, but it is clear that further oversight and accountability are still needed.

Overall, this Twitter exchange underscores the importance of congressional oversight in ensuring that law enforcement agencies operate within the bounds of the law and respect the rights of all individuals. It also serves as a reminder of the role that lawmakers play in holding government agencies accountable and protecting the interests of the public.

In conclusion, the interaction between Jim Jordan and Kash Patel sheds light on the ongoing debate surrounding surveillance practices and civil liberties. It also highlights the need for continued vigilance and oversight to safeguard the rights of individuals and prevent any potential abuses of power. As the conversation around these issues continues to evolve, it is crucial for policymakers and the public to remain engaged and informed to ensure that the principles of democracy and due process are upheld.

 innocent American citizens based on their political beliefs?"


KASH: "Absolutely not. The FBI’s top priority is national security, not political agendas."


JIM JORDAN: "Then why did the FBI ignore multiple warnings about the Parkland<a href=

shooter? Why did they fail to stop the Boston Marathon bombers? Why did they spy on the trump campaign? The American people deserve answers!"” />

In a recent exchange between Jim Jordan and Kash Patel, the former fired off a series of rapid-fire questions that left Democrats squirming. The heated discussion centered around the FBI’s alleged surveillance of parents at school board meetings, a topic that has been a major point of contention in recent months.

According to a tweet by Eric Daugherty, Jim Jordan put Kash Patel on the spot by asking, “Is the FBI still spying on parents at school board meetings?” Patel’s response was a firm “No, sir.” This statement directly contradicts the claims made by some Democrats, who have accused Patel of mishandling his duties at the FBI.

The exchange between Jordan and Patel is just one example of the intense political climate surrounding the issue of parental rights and government overreach. With tensions running high on both sides of the debate, it’s clear that this is a topic that is not going away anytime soon.

The fact that Patel was able to stand his ground and confidently answer Jordan’s questions is a testament to his integrity and professionalism. Despite facing intense scrutiny from Democrats, Patel remained composed and resolute in his responses.

This interaction highlights the importance of holding government agencies accountable for their actions and ensuring that they operate within the bounds of the law. The FBI’s alleged surveillance of parents at school board meetings has sparked outrage among many Americans, who view it as a violation of their rights and freedoms.

As the debate rages on, it’s crucial to remember that transparency and accountability are essential components of a functioning democracy. Citizens have the right to question their government and hold officials accountable for their actions. By asking tough questions and demanding answers, we can ensure that our voices are heard and that our rights are protected.

In conclusion, the exchange between Jim Jordan and Kash Patel serves as a reminder of the importance of governmental transparency and accountability. As the debate over parental rights and government surveillance continues, it’s essential that we remain vigilant and demand answers from those in positions of power. Only by holding officials accountable can we ensure that our rights and freedoms are upheld.

  1. School board surveillance
  2. FBI targeting parents
  3. Kash Patel interview
  4. Jim Jordan questions
  5. Democrat smears
  6. FBI surveillance controversy
  7. Kash Patel performance
  8. School board meetings investigation
  9. FBI tactics exposed
  10. Jim Jordan interrogation
  11. Democrat accusations
  12. FBI monitoring parents
  13. Kash Patel scrutiny
  14. School board privacy concerns
  15. FBI controversy
  16. Jim Jordan grilling
  17. Democrat criticism
  18. FBI investigation tactics
  19. Kash Patel backlash
  20. School board security scrutiny

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *