JusticeBabarSattar, termination, PTA chairman, GenHafeezurRehman, unconstitutional process

#BREAKING: #JusticeBabarSattar terminated appointment of chairman #PTA Gen (r) Hafeez ur Rehman in 99 pages judgement, declared “entire process of appointment of Chairman PTA has been found to suffer from malice in law being the product of an unconstitutional and illegal… pic.twitter.com/BnT2YFMPaM

— Asad Ali Toor (@AsadAToor) September 16, 2025

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

In a recent development, Justice Babar Sattar has made a groundbreaking decision to terminate the appointment of chairman PTA, Gen (r) Hafeez ur Rehman. This decision was made in a 99-page judgement, where Justice Sattar declared that the entire process of appointing the Chairman of PTA was unconstitutional and illegal due to malice in law.

The decision made by Justice Sattar has sent shockwaves through the political and legal landscape of the country. The termination of Gen (r) Hafeez ur Rehman’s appointment has raised questions about the legality and transparency of the appointment process within government institutions.

The judgement made by Justice Sattar highlights the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that appointments within government agencies are made in a fair and transparent manner. The decision to terminate Gen (r) Hafeez ur Rehman’s appointment serves as a reminder that no one is above the law, and that actions taken in violation of the constitution will not be tolerated.

This decision has sparked a heated debate among legal experts, politicians, and the general public. Many have praised Justice Sattar for his courage and commitment to upholding the rule of law, while others have criticized the decision as politically motivated.

It is important to note that the termination of Gen (r) Hafeez ur Rehman’s appointment will have far-reaching implications for the PTA and its operations. The appointment of a new chairman will need to be made in accordance with the law, and steps will need to be taken to ensure that the process is carried out transparently and fairly.

Overall, Justice Babar Sattar’s decision to terminate the appointment of chairman PTA, Gen (r) Hafeez ur Rehman, highlights the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that government appointments are made in a fair and transparent manner. This decision has sparked a debate about the legality and transparency of appointment processes within government institutions, and serves as a reminder that no one is above the law.

In a recent development that has sent shockwaves across the political landscape, #JusticeBabarSattar has terminated the appointment of Chairman #PTA, Gen (r) Hafeez ur Rehman, in a groundbreaking 99-page judgment. The judgment declared that the entire process of appointing the Chairman of PTA was tainted with malice in law, being the result of an unconstitutional and illegal…

The decision by #JusticeBabarSattar marks a significant turning point in the ongoing controversy surrounding the appointment of key officials in the telecommunications sector. The judgment, which was delivered with meticulous attention to detail over 99 pages, has laid bare the flaws in the process that led to the appointment of Gen (r) Hafeez ur Rehman as Chairman of PTA.

One of the key arguments put forth in the judgment was that the appointment of the Chairman of PTA was unconstitutional and illegal, thus rendering the entire process null and void. This has raised serious questions about the integrity of the appointment process and has called into question the legitimacy of Gen (r) Hafeez ur Rehman’s tenure as Chairman of PTA.

JusticeBabarSattar’s decision has been met with both praise and criticism from various quarters. Supporters of the judgment have hailed it as a victory for the rule of law and a step towards ensuring transparency and accountability in the appointment of key officials. Critics, on the other hand, have raised concerns about the potential impact of the judgment on the functioning of PTA and the broader telecommunications sector.

The judgment delivered by #JusticeBabarSattar has far-reaching implications for the telecommunications industry in Pakistan. It has highlighted the need for greater scrutiny and oversight in the appointment of key officials and has underscored the importance of upholding the rule of law in all aspects of governance.

In conclusion, the decision to terminate the appointment of Chairman PTA by #JusticeBabarSattar is a landmark ruling that has the potential to reshape the telecommunications sector in Pakistan. It serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in the appointment of key officials and underscores the need for upholding the rule of law in all governmental processes.

For more information on this breaking news, you can visit the original tweet by Asad Ali Toor here.

Justice Babar Sattar, PTA Chairman termination, Hafeez ur Rehman, unconstitutional appointment, high court judgement, malice in law, legal process, termination ruling, appointment controversy, PTA chairman removal, judiciary decision, legal implications, constitutional violation, judicial intervention, government appointment, legal proceedings, judicial ruling, legal scrutiny, appointment process scrutiny, termination declaration