WTF reactions, shocking confessions, media controversies, crime reporting ethics, emotional responses to violence

WTF?!

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

ABC’s Matt Gutman says that the messages of the shooter confessing to the m*rder of Charlie Kirk were “VERY TOUCHING.”

What about the confession of an alleged killer is “touching”???

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

Sickpic.twitter.com/cZb5uOHern

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 16, 2025

Summary of Controversial Comments on a Shooter’s Confession

In a recent and provocative statement, ABC’s Matt Gutman described the messages from a shooter who allegedly confessed to the murder of conservative figure Charlie Kirk as "VERY TOUCHING." This comment has sparked outrage and confusion among social media users and commentators alike, leading to widespread discussions about the appropriateness of such language in the context of violent crime and confession.

The Context of the Statement

The incident revolves around the confession of an alleged killer, which typically evokes feelings of horror and sadness rather than sentimentality. The use of the term "touching" to describe a murder confession raises critical questions about media framing and the language used in reporting on crime. By labeling such a confession as "very touching," Gutman’s comments seem to trivialize the severity of the crime, leaving many to wonder what aspect of a killer’s admission could be deemed emotionally resonant or heartwarming.

Public Reaction and Outrage

The reaction to Gutman’s comments has been swift and intense. Many individuals took to social media to express their disbelief and anger, questioning the ethics of a journalist using such terminology in reference to a murder confession. The phrase "What about the confession of an alleged killer is ‘touching’???" resonated with many, highlighting a collective discomfort with the normalization of violent crime in public discourse.

The sentiment expressed by users, including the prominent Twitter account Libs of TikTok, underscores a growing concern about how the media covers violence and crime. Critics argue that using emotionally charged language around confessions can desensitize audiences to the gravity of such acts and may even romanticize the actions of perpetrators.

The Role of Media Language in Crime Reporting

This incident serves as a case study in the impact of language on public perception. The choice of words by news outlets can shape narratives and influence how society interprets crime and justice. The use of "touching" in this context appears to contradict the general public’s expectation that discussions of violence should be handled with sensitivity and seriousness.

Moreover, the phrase can inadvertently contribute to a culture that sensationalizes crime, focusing more on the emotional aspects of the perpetrator’s experience rather than the implications for victims and their families. It raises ethical considerations about the responsibility of journalists in framing stories that involve loss, grief, and trauma.

Conclusion

In summary, Matt Gutman’s characterization of a murder confession as "very touching" has ignited a significant backlash, prompting discussions about media language, ethics, and the portrayal of crime. The reaction reflects a broader concern about how society engages with narratives of violence and the potential consequences of framing such confessions in emotionally charged terms. As these conversations continue, they highlight the need for a more thoughtful and responsible approach to crime reporting that prioritizes the experiences of victims and the seriousness of violent acts.