Susquehanna University, Chris Bailey, Charlie Kirk, leftist instigators, prayer vigil

BREAKING – Chris Bailey of Susquehanna University refused to allow a student at a prayer vigil for Charlie Kirk to record leftist instigators cheering his death, calling the person attempting to film them an “intimidator,” with the university later deleting its page on him. pic.twitter.com/8tpUpyUfzW

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

— Right Angle news Network (@Rightanglenews) September 15, 2025

In a shocking turn of events, Chris Bailey, a faculty member at Susquehanna University, made headlines for refusing to allow a student to record leftist instigators cheering the death of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk at a prayer vigil. The incident occurred when the student attempted to film the individuals celebrating Kirk’s passing, only to be labeled an “intimidator” by Bailey. The university later took a controversial step by deleting any mention of Bailey from its official page, sparking further outrage and scrutiny.

The incident, which took place during a prayer vigil for Charlie Kirk, has ignited a firestorm of controversy and debate surrounding freedom of speech, academic freedom, and the role of universities in protecting diverse viewpoints. The student, whose identity remains undisclosed, sought to document the disturbing behavior of individuals who were openly celebrating Kirk’s death, only to be met with resistance from Bailey.

Bailey’s decision to prevent the student from recording the leftist instigators has drawn criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with many condemning his actions as a violation of the student’s rights and an attempt to suppress dissenting voices. The incident has also raised questions about the university’s commitment to upholding free speech and intellectual diversity on campus.

The aftermath of the incident saw Susquehanna University deleting any reference to Chris Bailey on its official page, fueling speculation and rumors about the university’s motives and intentions. The move has been met with skepticism and distrust, as many believe that the university is attempting to cover up the incident and protect Bailey from further scrutiny.

The controversy surrounding Chris Bailey and Susquehanna University has reignited the debate on campus free speech and the importance of fostering a culture of open dialogue and respectful discourse. Many are calling for transparency and accountability from the university, demanding answers and explanations for the handling of the incident.

As the story continues to unfold, it serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing universities in navigating the increasingly polarized political landscape and balancing the competing demands of free speech and academic integrity. The incident has also highlighted the importance of upholding principles of tolerance, respect, and intellectual diversity in higher education institutions.

In conclusion, the incident involving Chris Bailey and the student recording leftist instigators at a prayer vigil for Charlie Kirk has sparked a heated debate on campus free speech and the role of universities in protecting diverse viewpoints. The controversy surrounding the incident has raised important questions about academic freedom, accountability, and the responsibilities of universities in fostering a culture of open dialogue and respectful discourse. It remains to be seen how Susquehanna University will address the fallout from the incident and what steps will be taken to ensure that similar incidents are handled in a transparent and fair manner in the future.

In a recent incident at Susquehanna University, Chris Bailey made headlines for his controversial actions during a prayer vigil for Charlie Kirk. The situation escalated when Bailey refused to allow a student to record leftist instigators cheering Kirk’s death. He went as far as calling the individual attempting to film them an “intimidator.” The university later took down its page on Bailey, sparking even more controversy.

The incident drew attention from various news outlets, including the Right Angle News Network, who reported on the incident in a tweet dated September 15, 2025. The tweet highlighted Bailey’s actions and the university’s response, which only added fuel to the fire.

The situation at Susquehanna University serves as a reminder of the importance of freedom of speech and the right to document public events. In today’s digital age, it is not uncommon for individuals to use their smartphones to capture important moments or hold others accountable for their actions. However, Bailey’s refusal to allow recording at the prayer vigil raises concerns about transparency and accountability.

It is essential for universities to uphold the values of free speech and open dialogue, even in situations where emotions are running high. By censoring the recording of leftist instigators, Susquehanna University may have inadvertently stifled important conversations and hindered the public’s ability to hold individuals accountable for their actions.

The decision to delete Bailey’s page on the university’s website only added to the controversy surrounding the incident. Deleting information or attempting to cover up a situation only serves to further erode trust and transparency. It is crucial for institutions to address issues head-on and engage in open dialogue with the public.

Moving forward, it is important for Susquehanna University to reflect on the incident and take steps to ensure that similar situations do not occur in the future. By promoting a culture of openness and accountability, the university can rebuild trust with its students, faculty, and the broader community.

In conclusion, the incident involving Chris Bailey at Susquehanna University serves as a stark reminder of the importance of upholding free speech and transparency. By allowing individuals to document public events and engage in open dialogue, institutions can foster a culture of trust and accountability. It is crucial for universities to address controversial situations head-on and work towards creating a more inclusive and open environment for all.

Susquehanna University controversy, Student censorship incident, Prayer vigil incident, Leftist instigators, Charlie Kirk event, Social media deletion, Campus free speech, Student recording dispute, University censorship, Political activism clash, Campus confrontation, First Amendment rights, Online backlash, Freedom of expression, Video recording controversy, Academic suppression, Campus event controversy, Activist confrontation, Free speech violation, Digital censorship incident