UCLA web page removal, Equity Director comments, Charlie Kirk assassination, Internet is forever, EDI controversy.

BREAKING: UCLA just took down their entire web page for their “Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI)” after I exposed their “Race and Equity” Director’s disgusting comments about Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

But the internet is forever. pic.twitter.com/uxV9SAqEZb

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

— Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist (@DeAngelisCorey) September 14, 2025

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) recently faced backlash after their “Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI)” came under scrutiny for controversial comments made by their “Race and Equity” Director. The director’s remarks about conservative commentator Charlie Kirk’s potential assassination sparked outrage and led to UCLA taking down their entire web page for the EDI office.

The incident was brought to light by Corey A. DeAngelis, a prominent advocate for school choice, who shared screenshots of the director’s comments on social media. In response to the public backlash, UCLA quickly removed the EDI web page from their website. However, as DeAngelis pointed out, the internet has a long memory, and the screenshots of the director’s comments will continue to circulate online.

This controversy highlights the ongoing debate surrounding free speech on college campuses and the role of diversity and inclusion initiatives in shaping campus culture. While universities often promote EDI offices as a means of fostering a more inclusive environment, incidents like this raise questions about the effectiveness of such programs and the boundaries of acceptable discourse within academic institutions.

The fallout from this incident may have long-term implications for UCLA’s reputation and their approach to addressing issues of equity, diversity, and inclusion. As public scrutiny intensifies, the university will need to navigate the delicate balance between promoting diversity and protecting free speech rights on campus.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding UCLA’s EDI office serves as a reminder of the challenges universities face in fostering inclusive environments while also upholding principles of free speech and open dialogue. As institutions of higher education grapple with these complex issues, it is essential for them to engage in transparent and constructive dialogue to address concerns and uphold their commitment to academic freedom and diversity.

In a shocking turn of events, UCLA has taken down their entire web page for their “Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI)” after shocking comments made by their “Race and Equity” Director surfaced. The comments, which were exposed by Corey A. DeAngelis, a school choice evangelist, were deemed as disgusting and inappropriate. The Director’s remarks about Charlie Kirk’s assassination were met with outrage and led to swift action by the University.

The internet is indeed forever, as the tweet containing the Director’s comments continues to circulate online. This incident serves as a reminder of the power of social media in holding individuals and institutions accountable for their words and actions. It also highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in organizations that claim to promote diversity and inclusion.

The controversy surrounding the Director’s comments has sparked a larger conversation about the role of equity and diversity initiatives in educational institutions. Many are questioning the sincerity of these programs and calling for greater oversight and accountability. It is essential for institutions like UCLA to uphold the values of equity and inclusion in both their words and actions.

The decision to take down the web page for the “Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion” is a step in the right direction, but it is only the beginning. UCLA must take further action to address the underlying issues that allowed such comments to be made in the first place. This incident should serve as a wake-up call for all organizations to reevaluate their commitment to diversity and inclusion.

Moving forward, it is crucial for UCLA to rebuild trust with its students, faculty, and the community at large. Transparency, accountability, and genuine efforts to promote equity and inclusion are key to restoring confidence in the institution. It is essential for UCLA to take concrete steps to address the harm caused by the Director’s comments and to prevent similar incidents from happening in the future.

In conclusion, this incident at UCLA serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of upholding the values of equity, diversity, and inclusion in all aspects of society. It is a wake-up call for institutions to reevaluate their commitment to these principles and to take meaningful action to promote a more inclusive and equitable environment for all. The internet may be forever, but so too should be our dedication to creating a better and more just world for everyone.

UCLA website takedown, Equity and Inclusion scandal, Charlie Kirk controversy, Race director comments, Internet history, Diversity office removal, EDI webpage removal, Social media backlash, Campus controversy, Online exposure, Free speech debate, Censorship issue, College scandal, Political comments, Digital footprint, Webpage removal fallout, University controversy, Online accountability, Campus news, Internet scandal.