
- American democracy under threat
- Media bias against trump supporters
- Trump supporters labeled dangerous
- Political division in America
- President’s divisive rhetoric
Hello ABC news,
Three years ago, the sitting President of the United States declared that 74 million Americans who voted for Donald Trump were a “threat to the foundations of the Republic.” You and your peers in the media cheered him on and amplified the smear.
You’ve…
— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) September 13, 2025
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
In a recent tweet, DataRepublican (small r) highlighted a concerning issue regarding the media’s treatment of Donald Trump supporters. The tweet addressed a statement made by the sitting President of the United States three years ago, in which he labeled 74 million Americans who voted for Trump as a “threat to the foundations of the Republic.” DataRepublican criticized the media, including ABC News, for cheering on this divisive rhetoric and amplifying the smear against Trump supporters.
The tweet brings to light the dangerous trend of demonizing political opponents and creating division within the country. By portraying a large portion of the population as a threat to the Republic, the media is fueling animosity and further polarizing an already divided nation. This type of language only serves to deepen the political divide and prevent meaningful dialogue and understanding between opposing viewpoints.
It is crucial for the media, including news outlets like ABC News, to uphold their responsibility to provide fair and unbiased reporting. By allowing such inflammatory rhetoric to go unchallenged, the media risks further eroding trust in journalism and perpetuating a climate of fear and hostility.
As we navigate these turbulent times, it is more important than ever for the media to act as a bridge for understanding and dialogue, rather than a tool for spreading divisiveness and hatred. It is imperative that news outlets strive to present a balanced and nuanced perspective on political issues, and refrain from demonizing any group of people based on their political beliefs.
In conclusion, the tweet by DataRepublican serves as a reminder of the importance of responsible and ethical journalism in today’s political landscape. It is crucial for the media to uphold their role as impartial observers and facilitators of informed debate, rather than contributing to the polarization and hostility that plagues our society. By holding the media accountable for their role in perpetuating division, we can work towards a more united and understanding future for all Americans.

Hello ABC News,
Three years ago, the sitting President of the United States declared that 74 million Americans who voted for Donald Trump were a “threat to the foundations of the Republic.” You and your peers in the media cheered him on and amplified the smear.
You’ve…
— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) September 13, 2025
Hello ABC News,
It’s been three years since the sitting President of the United States made a shocking statement, declaring that 74 million Americans who voted for Donald Trump were a “threat to the foundations of the Republic.” The media, including you and your peers, didn’t hesitate to amplify this smear.
The power of the media in shaping public opinion cannot be underestimated. When a statement like this is made by the President, it is the duty of the media to provide balanced and fair coverage. Instead, what we often see is a rush to sensationalize and polarize, further dividing an already fractured society.
As a major news outlet, ABC News has a responsibility to provide accurate and unbiased reporting. When the President made such a divisive statement, it was crucial for the media to critically analyze the implications and provide context for the American people.
Unfortunately, what we often see in today’s media landscape is a rush to judgment and a lack of deep analysis. Instead of delving into the complexities of why such a statement was made and what it means for the country, the media often resorts to sensational headlines and soundbites.
In a time when trust in the media is at an all-time low, it is more important than ever for outlets like ABC News to uphold the highest standards of journalism. This means presenting all sides of a story, fact-checking information, and providing context to help readers make informed decisions.
When the President made the statement about 74 million Americans being a threat to the Republic, it was a moment that required careful consideration and reflection. Instead of blindly echoing his words, the media should have taken a step back and analyzed the implications of such a statement.
As a news outlet with a large audience, ABC News has the power to shape public opinion and influence the national discourse. With this power comes a great responsibility to provide accurate, fair, and balanced reporting.
In today’s media landscape, where misinformation and polarization run rampant, it is more crucial than ever for outlets like ABC News to uphold the highest standards of journalism. This means going beyond sensational headlines and shallow analysis to provide in-depth reporting that helps readers understand the complexities of the issues at hand.
When the President makes a statement that divides the country, it is the duty of the media to provide context, fact-checking, and analysis. By doing so, outlets like ABC News can help bridge the divide and foster a more informed and engaged citizenry.
So, ABC News, as a major player in the media landscape, it’s time to step up and fulfill your duty to the American people. Provide accurate, fair, and balanced reporting that helps bridge the divide and foster a more informed society. The future of our democracy depends on it.
ABC News, American democracy, Donald Trump supporters, Media bias, Political polarization, Republic threat, President’s statement, Voter division, News coverage, Partisan politics, Public opinion, Political discourse, Media influence, American voters, Political controversy, Election aftermath, Media narrative, Political rhetoric, Public perception, Media manipulation