1. BCCI disgrace
2. PCB funding terror
3. Shameful cricket ties
4. Terror state enrichment
5. Asia Cup controversy

An absolute shame on the @BCCI.

This was my view a few weeks ago.

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

This is my view today.

Cricket with Pakistan legitimises a terror state, enriches the PCB & Pak economy & thereby indirectly funds the cycle of terror.

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

Shame. #AsiaCup2025 #INDvsPAK pic.twitter.com/H5O8bm5IzQ

— Shiv Aroor (@ShivAroor) September 13, 2025

The tweet by Shiv Aroor, a prominent Indian journalist and TV anchor, criticizes the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) for participating in cricket matches with Pakistan. Aroor expresses his disappointment with the BCCI’s decision to engage in sporting events with Pakistan, stating that playing cricket with Pakistan legitimizes a “terror state” and indirectly funds terrorism.

The tweet highlights Aroor’s change in perspective on the matter, as he previously held a different view on the issue. He argues that by engaging in cricket matches with Pakistan, the BCCI is not only enriching the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) and the Pakistani economy but also indirectly supporting terrorism.

The tweet specifically mentions the Asia Cup 2025 and the highly anticipated match between India and Pakistan, using the hashtag #INDvsPAK. Aroor’s tweet is accompanied by a graphic that emphasizes his point, further illustrating his strong stance against cricketing ties with Pakistan.

The tweet has sparked a debate among cricket fans and political commentators, with some supporting Aroor’s viewpoint and others defending the BCCI’s decision to participate in matches with Pakistan. The controversy surrounding cricketing relations between India and Pakistan is not new, as the two countries have a long history of political tensions and conflicts.

In conclusion, Shiv Aroor’s tweet sheds light on the complex relationship between sports and politics, particularly in the context of India-Pakistan cricket matches. The tweet serves as a reminder of the power of sports to influence diplomatic relations and the importance of considering the broader implications of sporting engagements with politically sensitive nations.

The recent controversy surrounding the Board of Control for Cricket in India (@BCCI) and their decision to engage in a series with Pakistan has sparked heated debates across the cricketing world. Just a few weeks ago, the idea of playing against Pakistan was met with criticism, but today, it seems that the match is set to go ahead. This decision has raised concerns about the implications of playing cricket with a country like Pakistan, which has been accused of supporting terrorism.

Cricket is often seen as a uniting force, bringing together players and fans from different countries and cultures. However, when it comes to playing against Pakistan, the situation becomes more complex. Many argue that engaging in cricket matches with Pakistan legitimizes a country that has been accused of supporting terrorism. This not only tarnishes the reputation of the sport but also raises questions about the values that cricket stands for.

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) and the Pakistani economy stand to benefit greatly from matches against India. The revenue generated from these matches can help boost the PCB’s finances and contribute to the overall economy of Pakistan. However, critics argue that by participating in these matches, India indirectly funds the cycle of terror in Pakistan. This raises serious ethical concerns about the impact of cricket on global security and stability.

Shiv Aroor, a prominent journalist, expressed his disappointment with the BCCI’s decision in a tweet. He highlighted the dangers of playing cricket with Pakistan and the potential consequences of supporting a country that has been linked to terrorist activities. His tweet has sparked a larger conversation about the role of sports in politics and the ethical implications of engaging with countries with controversial reputations.

The upcoming Asia Cup 2025 match between India and Pakistan has become a focal point for this debate. The hashtag #INDvsPAK has been trending on social media, with fans and critics alike sharing their opinions on whether the match should go ahead. While some argue that sports should be kept separate from politics, others believe that playing against Pakistan sends the wrong message and has wider implications for global security.

As fans eagerly anticipate the Asia Cup 2025 match, it is essential to consider the broader implications of engaging in cricket matches with countries like Pakistan. While sports can be a powerful tool for diplomacy and cultural exchange, it is crucial to weigh the ethical considerations of playing against countries with controversial backgrounds. The decision to play against Pakistan may have far-reaching consequences that extend beyond the boundaries of the cricket pitch.

In conclusion, the decision by the BCCI to engage in matches with Pakistan has sparked a heated debate about the ethical implications of playing against a country linked to terrorism. As fans and critics alike voice their opinions on social media, it is clear that this issue goes beyond the realm of sports. The Asia Cup 2025 match between India and Pakistan will be a significant moment in the history of cricket, with lasting implications for the sport and global security. Let us all reflect on the values that cricket stands for and the impact of our actions on the world stage.

BCCI disgrace, Cricket controversy, Terror funding allegations, India-Pakistan match, PCB criticism, Terrorism connection, Asia Cup controversy, BCCI backlash, Cricket diplomacy debate, Terror state association, BCCI shame, Political cricket, Anti-BCCI sentiment, Terror financing accusations, Cricket ethics, India-Pakistan rivalry, BCCI outrage, PCB condemnation, Cricket politics, Asia Cup tensions