1. State bill examination
2. Time limit challenge
3. Constitutional review power
4. Mandamus separation breach
5. President Governor ASSENT

BOLD STAND by Modi govt in Supreme Court

Centre on time limits for President & Governors in giving ASSENT to state bills:

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

— They can EXAMINE constitutionality of Bills
— DEADLINES may be SELF-DESTRUCTIVE
— Mandamus on their functions would breach SEPARATION OF POWERS

— Megh Updates (@MeghUpdates) September 12, 2025

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

In a bold move, the Modi government has taken a stand in the Supreme Court regarding time limits for the President and Governors to give assent to state bills. The Centre has asserted that they have the right to examine the constitutionality of bills and that imposing deadlines on them could be self-destructive. Additionally, the government has argued that issuing a mandamus on their functions would breach the separation of powers.

This development has sparked discussions and debates among legal experts and political analysts. The government’s stance on this issue has raised questions about the balance of powers between the executive, legislative, and judiciary branches of government.

The decision to challenge the time limits for assent to state bills reflects the government’s commitment to upholding the principles of the Constitution and ensuring that the rule of law is respected. By asserting their right to examine the constitutionality of bills, the Centre is sending a strong message about their dedication to good governance and transparency in the legislative process.

The argument that deadlines for assent could be self-destructive highlights the potential risks of rushing through important legislation without proper scrutiny. By allowing sufficient time for the examination of bills, the government is prioritizing the quality and legality of the legislation over speed and efficiency.

Furthermore, the government’s concern about breaching the separation of powers through a mandamus on their functions underscores the importance of maintaining independence and autonomy within each branch of government. By respecting the boundaries between the executive, legislative, and judiciary, the government is reinforcing the checks and balances that are essential for a healthy democracy.

Overall, the Modi government’s bold stand in the Supreme Court on time limits for assent to state bills showcases their commitment to upholding the principles of the Constitution and ensuring that the rule of law is upheld. This move has sparked important debates about the balance of powers and the role of each branch of government in the legislative process. It will be interesting to see how this case unfolds and what implications it may have for the future of governance in India.

In a bold move by the Modi government, a stand was taken in the Supreme Court regarding time limits for Presidents and Governors to give assent to State bills. This decision has sparked a debate on the constitutionality of bills, the potential self-destructive nature of deadlines, and the breach of separation of powers if mandamus is placed on their functions. Let’s delve deeper into the implications of this decision.

### Examining the Constitutionality of Bills

One of the key points raised by the Centre is the ability for Presidents and Governors to examine the constitutionality of bills before giving their assent. This is a crucial aspect of the legislative process, ensuring that proposed laws align with the principles and provisions of the constitution. By allowing for this examination, it ensures that only laws that are in compliance with the constitution are enacted, safeguarding the rights and interests of the citizens.

### Potential Self-Destructive Deadlines

The Centre also highlighted the potential self-destructive nature of imposing strict deadlines on Presidents and Governors to give assent to State bills. Deadlines, if too rigid, can impede the thorough examination of proposed laws, leading to rushed decisions that may have unintended consequences. By allowing for a more flexible approach to time limits, it ensures that proper scrutiny is given to each bill, promoting better governance and decision-making.

### Breach of Separation of Powers

Another critical point raised by the Centre is the breach of separation of powers that could occur if mandamus is placed on the functions of Presidents and Governors. The separation of powers is a fundamental principle in democratic systems, ensuring a system of checks and balances between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. By mandating specific actions or timelines for Presidents and Governors, it could undermine this balance and concentration of power in one branch, potentially leading to abuses of authority.

In conclusion, the stand taken by the Modi government in the Supreme Court regarding time limits for Presidents and Governors in giving assent to State bills raises important considerations about the constitutionality of bills, the impact of deadlines, and the preservation of the separation of powers. It is essential to strike a balance between efficiency and thoroughness in the legislative process, ensuring that laws are enacted in a manner that upholds the principles of democracy and good governance.

Modi government Supreme Court, Presidential Assent time limits, State bills examination, Constitutionality review, Self-destructive deadlines, Mandamus functions, Separation of Powers breach, Modi govt legal challenges, President Governor powers, State bill approval process, Modi administration legal battles, Constitutional review deadlines, Mandamus limitations, Supreme Court rulings, Executive authority limits, State bill vetting, Governmental checks and balances, Legislative process oversight, Modi administration legal actions, Constitutional compliance scrutiny.