Japanese government requests deletion of 4万6648 items from X in 2024, Average 3887 deletion requests per month
2024 Japanese government requests X to delete 4万6648 items in first half of the year
Japanese government asks X to delete 4万6648 items in first half of 2024
X receives 4万6648 deletion requests from Japanese government in 2024
Japanese government demands X to delete 4万6648 items in 2024

嘘ではなく事実です

日本政府はX（旧Twitter）に対して2024年の上半期は4万6648件も削除要請をしています。
1ヶ月に平均3887件も削除要請していますhttps://t.co/t9hx5WsuUh https://t.co/KJmvkC2QaD pic.twitter.com/NLOylYThOt

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

— 髙橋𝕏羚@闇を暴く人。 (@Parsonalsecret) September 7, 2025

The Japanese government has been actively requesting the removal of content from the social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter). In the first half of 2024 alone, they made a staggering 46,648 removal requests, averaging about 3,887 requests per month. This information was shared by a Twitter user named 髙橋𝕏羚@闇を暴く人。 on September 7, 2025.

The tweet, written in Japanese, highlights the fact that these removal requests are not just rumors but actual facts. The government’s actions raise concerns about freedom of expression and censorship on the internet. It also sheds light on the growing trend of governments around the world exerting control over social media platforms to regulate online content.

The link provided in the tweet leads to a news article or report that likely provides more details about the government’s removal requests and the reasoning behind them. It is essential to stay informed about such developments to understand the implications for online freedom and privacy.

The tweet’s author, 髙橋𝕏羚@闇を暴く人。, seems to be a user who is dedicated to uncovering the truth and shedding light on dark or hidden aspects of society. Their tweet serves as a warning or call to action for others to be aware of the government’s actions and to advocate for transparency and accountability in online governance.

This revelation about the Japanese government’s extensive removal requests on X raises questions about the platform’s policies regarding content moderation and censorship. It also prompts discussions about the balance between freedom of speech and the need to protect individuals from harmful or misleading information online.

As the digital landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial for users, policymakers, and tech companies to engage in meaningful conversations about online governance and the responsibilities that come with it. Transparency, accountability, and respect for fundamental rights should guide decisions about content moderation and censorship on social media platforms.

In conclusion, the tweet shared by 髙橋𝕏羚@闇を暴く人。 highlights the significant number of removal requests made by the Japanese government on the social media platform X. This information underscores the importance of staying informed about online governance issues and advocating for a fair and transparent digital environment. It also emphasizes the need for ongoing dialogue and collaboration to address the complex challenges of content moderation and censorship in the digital age.

In a recent development, it has come to light that the Japanese government has made a staggering 46,648 deletion requests to X (formerly known as Twitter) during the first half of the year 2024. This amounts to an average of 3,887 deletion requests per month. These numbers are not just rumors but are actual facts, shedding light on the extent to which the government is involved in regulating online content.

The sheer volume of deletion requests raises questions about the extent of government intervention in social media platforms. It also highlights the ongoing debate surrounding freedom of speech and censorship in the digital age. As we delve deeper into this issue, it becomes crucial to understand the implications of such actions on the broader online landscape.

One of the key concerns surrounding the government’s deletion requests is the potential impact on freedom of expression. While it is important to address harmful content and misinformation online, there is a fine line between regulating harmful content and stifling free speech. The increasing number of deletion requests raises concerns about censorship and the potential suppression of dissenting voices.

It is essential to consider the broader implications of government intervention in online platforms. While the government may have legitimate reasons for requesting deletions, such as preventing the spread of false information or protecting national security, there is a need for transparency and accountability in the process. Users have a right to know why certain content is being removed and what criteria are being used to make these decisions.

Furthermore, the impact of government intervention extends beyond individual users to the broader online community. The removal of content can have far-reaching implications on public discourse, shaping the way information is disseminated and consumed. It is essential to strike a balance between protecting users from harmful content and upholding the principles of free speech and open dialogue.

As we navigate the complex landscape of online regulation, it is crucial to engage in open and transparent discussions about the role of governments in shaping online content. By fostering dialogue and promoting transparency, we can work towards creating a digital environment that upholds freedom of expression while also addressing legitimate concerns about harmful content.

In conclusion, the high number of deletion requests made by the Japanese government to X (formerly Twitter) during the first half of 2024 is a significant development that raises important questions about freedom of speech, censorship, and government intervention in online platforms. It is essential to continue the conversation around these issues and work towards a balanced approach that protects users while upholding the principles of free speech and open dialogue.

Japanese government, social media regulation, misinformation removal, online censorship, truth vs lies, fact-checking, digital content moderation, internet transparency, online information accuracy, government intervention, digital misinformation control, truth enforcement, information integrity, online platform monitoring, content authenticity verification, digital truth verification, online rumor control, fact-based communication, reliable information dissemination, trustworthy online sources