political division, constitutional rights, National Guard authority, media commentary, Trump supporters

Trump’s base is splintering.

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

Megyn Kelly: “You can’t just send the National Guard into random cities…It very clearly is not constitutionally permissible. He cannot do it.” pic.twitter.com/GjXdvE3yRA

— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) September 7, 2025

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

Summary of the Current Political Landscape: Trump’s Base and Constitutional Concerns

In September 2025, the political landscape in the United States has seen significant shifts, particularly relating to former President Donald trump and his supporters. Recently, prominent media personality Megyn Kelly made headlines with her critical remarks regarding Trump’s potential use of the National Guard, emphasizing that he cannot constitutionally deploy them into random cities. This statement highlights a growing division within Trump’s base and raises important questions about the legality of such actions.

The Splintering of Trump’s Base

The phrase "Trump’s base is splintering" encapsulates a critical moment in American politics. Over the years, Trump’s support has been characterized by fervent loyalty; however, recent developments suggest that this loyalty is being tested. As various factions within the republican Party and among Trump’s supporters begin to emerge, it becomes increasingly evident that not all followers are aligned with his strategies or rhetoric.

One of the main factors contributing to this splintering is the political and social climate in the country. Issues such as race relations, civil rights, and police reform have ignited passionate debates among the electorate. Many of Trump’s supporters are grappling with the implications of these issues, leading to a reevaluation of their allegiance. As a result, some segments of his base are becoming more vocal about their dissatisfaction with certain policies and approaches.

Megyn Kelly’s Constitutional Concerns

Megyn Kelly’s comments regarding the National Guard reflect a broader concern about the constitutional limits of executive power. She stated, “You can’t just send the National Guard into random cities…It very clearly is not constitutionally permissible. He cannot do it.” This assertion raises critical questions about the appropriate use of military force within civilian jurisdictions and the potential overreach of executive authority.

The National Guard is traditionally used to maintain order during times of unrest, but its deployment must adhere to constitutional guidelines. Kelly’s statement serves as a reminder that the rule of law and constitutional protections are paramount in a democracy. Her remarks resonate with many who fear that any unilateral action taken by a president could undermine the checks and balances essential to American governance.

The Implications of Kelly’s Statement

Kelly’s criticism is significant not only because of her prominence in media but also due to the potential repercussions for Trump’s political future. If Trump’s base perceives that he is overstepping his constitutional authority, it could lead to a further erosion of support. This dynamic is crucial for understanding the current political climate and the potential for continued fragmentation within the Republican Party.

Moreover, Kelly’s comments could embolden other critics of Trump, both within and outside the party. As more voices join the conversation regarding constitutional limits, there may be a growing movement advocating for a return to foundational democratic principles. This could lead to a revitalization of certain political factions that prioritize constitutional adherence over partisan loyalty.

Political Ramifications

The ramifications of this splintering base and constitutional discourse are profound. As the 2026 midterm elections approach, candidates will need to navigate this complex landscape carefully. Candidates aligned with Trump may find themselves needing to address the concerns of those who are uneasy about his recent rhetoric and decisions. On the other hand, challengers within the Republican Party may see an opportunity to capitalize on this fragmentation by positioning themselves as advocates for constitutional integrity and responsible governance.

In addition, the issues raised by Kelly and others could have implications beyond electoral politics. As citizens become more engaged in discussions about the limits of presidential power, there may be a renewed focus on civic education and constitutional literacy. This could foster a more informed electorate that demands accountability and adherence to democratic principles from their leaders.

Conclusion

The current political landscape is marked by a significant splintering of Trump’s base, as highlighted by Megyn Kelly’s remarks on the constitutional implications of deploying the National Guard. The discourse surrounding executive power and constitutional limits is critical to understanding the evolving dynamics within the Republican Party and the broader American electorate.

As the nation moves forward, it is essential for both political leaders and citizens to engage in thoughtful discussions about governance, accountability, and the importance of upholding constitutional values. Only through such engagement can the country navigate the complexities of its political landscape and work towards a more unified future.

The unfolding events emphasize the necessity for vigilance in protecting democratic institutions and ensuring that all actions taken by elected officials align with the principles enshrined in the Constitution. As we look ahead to the upcoming elections and beyond, the need for informed discourse and active civic participation has never been more pressing.