• House floor Epstein list
• Massie, Greene immunity
• Constitutional client list
• Thomas Massie immunity
• Marjorie Taylor Greene

BREAKING: Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene to read Epstein “client list” on house floor protected by constitutional immunity clause.

— Dominic Michael Tripi (@DMichaelTripi) September 4, 2025

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

In a shocking turn of events, Congressman Thomas Massie and Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene have announced their intention to read out Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous “client list” on the floor of the House of Representatives. This announcement has sent shockwaves through the political world, as the list is said to contain the names of powerful individuals who were allegedly involved in Epstein’s illegal activities.

What makes this even more startling is the fact that Massie and Greene plan to do this under the protection of the constitutional immunity clause. This clause, which is designed to protect members of Congress from legal repercussions for their statements made on the House floor, is being used in a way that has never been seen before. By invoking this clause, Massie and Greene are essentially shielded from any potential legal consequences that may arise from their actions.

The decision to read out the “client list” is sure to spark controversy and outrage, as it will potentially expose individuals who may have been involved in Epstein’s illicit activities. The repercussions of this move could be far-reaching, as it could lead to investigations, resignations, and even criminal charges for those named on the list.

It is clear that Massie and Greene are taking a bold and risky step by choosing to reveal this information on the House floor. Their actions are sure to draw attention from the media, the public, and their colleagues in Congress. The fallout from this decision could have significant implications for both politicians and the individuals named on the list.

As this story continues to unfold, it will be important to monitor the reactions and responses from all parties involved. The impact of this revelation could be profound, and it is likely to dominate headlines for weeks to come. Massie and Greene’s decision to read out the “client list” is a bold move that will undoubtedly have lasting consequences for all involved.

In a surprising turn of events, Representatives Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene have announced their intention to read out Jeffrey Epstein’s "client list" on the House floor, invoking constitutional immunity to protect themselves. The news, shared by Dominic Michael Tripi on Twitter, has sparked a wave of controversy and intrigue across social media platforms.

The Revelation: Breaking News

The announcement made by Massie and Greene to read out Epstein’s list of clients has sent shockwaves through the political landscape. With the protection of constitutional immunity, the two representatives are set to reveal the names of individuals allegedly associated with Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender.

The Implications: Unveiling the Truth

The decision to disclose this information on the House floor raises questions about the extent of Epstein’s connections and the possible involvement of prominent figures in his illicit activities. By utilizing constitutional immunity, Massie and Greene are positioning themselves as whistleblowers, shedding light on a dark chapter in recent history.

The Backlash: Stirring Controversy

As news of Massie and Greene’s plans spread, reactions have been mixed. Some view their actions as courageous and necessary to uncover the truth, while others criticize them for potentially causing harm to individuals named in the list. The debate over the ethics and repercussions of this revelation is likely to intensify in the coming days.

The Fallout: A Divisive Moment

The decision to read out Epstein’s "client list" on the House floor has highlighted the deep divisions within the political sphere. While some applaud Massie and Greene for their transparency and commitment to accountability, others condemn them for potentially exploiting sensitive information for political gain. The fallout from this controversial move is sure to reverberate in the halls of power for some time to come.

The Controversy: Uncovering Dark Secrets

The Epstein case has long been shrouded in mystery and speculation, with allegations of a far-reaching network of powerful individuals involved in his activities. By revealing the names on his client list, Massie and Greene are aiming to expose any potential wrongdoing and hold those responsible to account. The implications of this revelation could be far-reaching and have lasting consequences for those implicated.

The Aftermath: Seeking Justice

In the aftermath of this revelation, calls for justice and accountability are likely to grow louder. The public is eager to see transparency and integrity upheld, especially when it comes to matters as serious as those surrounding Epstein and his associates. Massie and Greene’s actions may serve as a catalyst for further investigations and revelations into this complex and troubling case.

In Conclusion

The decision by Representatives Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene to read out Jeffrey Epstein’s "client list" on the House floor protected by constitutional immunity has sparked a firestorm of controversy and debate. As the details of this revelation continue to unfold, the public remains divided on the implications and ethics of this bold move. Only time will tell what impact this decision will have on the political landscape and the quest for truth and justice.

1. Political scandal
2. House floor drama
3. Congressional immunity
4. Epstein connections
5. Lawmakers reveal secrets
6. Constitutional protection
7. Public disclosure
8. High-profile testimony
9. Washington controversy
10. Government immunity clause
11. Congressional privilege
12. Shocking revelations
13. VIP client list
14. Federal lawmakers
15. Confidential information
16. Legal immunity clause
17. House of Representatives
18. Breaking news update
19. Political ethics
20. Congressional investigation