Islamic radical employee, Afghan refugee crisis, Anti-Trump resistance, State Department scandal, Terminate @wardahkhalid

EXCLUSIVE: Islamic Radical @wardahkhalid_ Still Employed At US state Department @StateDept Despite Overseeing Disastrous Afghan Refugee Resettlement In US & Calling For Anti-Trump ‘Resistance’

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

She must immediately be terminated from her job. @SecRubio https://t.co/btqN5U9kLL

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) August 26, 2025

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that Islamic radical Wardah Khalid is still employed at the US State Department, despite her involvement in the disastrous Afghan refugee resettlement in the US and her calls for anti-Trump ‘resistance’. This alarming news has sparked outrage among many, with calls for her immediate termination from her position.

Wardah Khalid’s continued employment at the State Department has raised serious concerns about the vetting process for government employees and the potential risks of having individuals with extremist ideologies in sensitive positions. Her role in overseeing the Afghan refugee resettlement program, which has been plagued with problems and inefficiencies, has further added to the controversy surrounding her employment.

Many have criticized Khalid for her anti-Trump rhetoric and her apparent support for radical Islamic ideologies. Her calls for ‘resistance’ against the former president have been met with widespread condemnation, especially in light of her position within the State Department. The fact that she is still employed despite these actions has sparked a heated debate about the government’s handling of such cases.

The public outcry against Khalid’s continued employment has been fueled by investigative journalist Laura Loomer, who brought this issue to light in a recent tweet. Loomer called for Khalid’s immediate termination from her job, citing the potential risks associated with having someone with her background and beliefs in a position of power within the government.

The controversy surrounding Wardah Khalid’s employment at the State Department is not just a matter of political ideology, but also a question of national security. With the rise of extremism and terrorism around the world, it is crucial to ensure that individuals with radical views are not in positions where they can potentially harm the country’s interests.

The call for Khalid’s termination has gained traction on social media, with many expressing their concerns about her continued presence in the government. Senator Rubio has been tagged in these tweets, signaling a push for action to be taken to address this issue and ensure the safety and security of the nation.

In conclusion, the revelation that Wardah Khalid, an Islamic radical with ties to extremist ideologies, is still employed at the US State Department has sparked outrage and calls for her immediate termination. This issue raises questions about the government’s vetting process for employees and the potential risks of having individuals with such backgrounds in sensitive positions. It is imperative that swift action is taken to address this situation and prevent any further harm to national security.

In a recent tweet by Laura Loomer, it was revealed that an Islamic radical, Wardah Khalid, is still employed at the US State Department despite overseeing a disastrous Afghan refugee resettlement program in the US and calling for anti-Trump ‘resistance’. This news has sparked outrage among many individuals who believe that she should be immediately terminated from her position.

Who is Wardah Khalid, and why is her continued employment at the US State Department causing such a stir? Wardah Khalid is known for her controversial views and actions, including her involvement in the Afghan refugee resettlement program, which has been widely criticized for its inefficiency and lack of proper oversight. Additionally, her public calls for anti-Trump ‘resistance’ have raised concerns about her ability to impartially carry out her duties as a government official.

Despite these concerns, Wardah Khalid remains employed at the US State Department, leading many to question the decision-making process that allowed her to retain her position. The fact that she has not been held accountable for her actions has only fueled the fire of discontent among those who believe that she is unfit to serve in such a sensitive role.

The issue of Wardah Khalid’s continued employment at the US State Department has brought to light broader questions about the integrity of the department and the individuals who work within it. Many are calling for greater transparency and accountability in the hiring and retention of government officials to ensure that those in positions of power are held to the highest standards of ethical conduct.

It is imperative that the US State Department takes swift action to address the concerns raised by Wardah Khalid’s continued employment. The department must demonstrate that it is committed to upholding the values of integrity and professionalism by holding its employees accountable for their actions and ensuring that those who do not meet these standards are removed from their positions.

In conclusion, the revelation that Wardah Khalid, an Islamic radical, is still employed at the US State Department despite overseeing a disastrous Afghan refugee resettlement program and calling for anti-Trump ‘resistance’ is deeply troubling. It is essential that the department takes immediate steps to address this issue and restore public trust in the integrity of its operations. The American people deserve to know that their government is being held to the highest standards of ethical conduct, and that those who fail to meet these standards are held accountable for their actions.

1. Radical Islamic employee,
2. State Department controversy,
3. Afghan refugee crisis,
4. Anti-Trump activism,
5. US government employment scandal,
6. Employee termination demand,
7. Political resistance,
8. Refugee resettlement failure,
9. National security concern,
10. Islamic extremism in government,
11. State Department oversight issue,
12. Employee accountability call,
13. Refugee crisis mismanagement,
14. Anti-Trump sentiment,
15. Government employee controversy,
16. National security risk,
17. Radical Islamic influence,
18. State Department employment dispute,
19. Refugee resettlement chaos,
20. Political activism controversy.