YES! !
gender ideology funding, education policy debate, youth curriculum changes
BREAKING: Gavin Newsom just lost federal funding for a program that taught young students gender ideology.
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
thanks to Health Secretary RFK Jr. pulling the plug.
Do you support this?
YES or NO?
IF you support this, Give me a THUMBS-UP! pic.twitter.com/kz6aM8h70w
— ᴺᵉʷˢ Ivanka trump (@IvankaNews_) August 24, 2025
Gavin Newsom Loses Federal Funding for Gender Ideology Program
In a significant development, Gavin Newsom has lost federal funding for a program aimed at educating young students about gender ideology. This decision comes after Health Secretary RFK Jr. decided to pull the plug on the initiative, sparking a wave of reactions across social media.
Support for the Decision
The decision has ignited discussions about the appropriateness of teaching gender ideology to young students. Many supporters of RFK Jr.’s action argue that such topics may not be suitable for children, emphasizing the need for age-appropriate educational content. Others believe that understanding gender diversity is crucial and should be part of modern education.
Your Opinion Matters
A poll conducted on social media asked followers whether they supported RFK Jr.’s decision. Participants were encouraged to express their views with a simple thumbs-up or thumbs-down. This kind of engagement highlights how deeply people feel about educational content and the influence of government funding on school programs.
The Broader Implications
The loss of federal funding could have broader implications for public education systems, especially in states that align with Newsom’s views. The debate over gender ideology in schools is ongoing, and this situation may set a precedent for future educational policies across the nation.
In conclusion, the conversation surrounding gender ideology in education is far from over. As parents, educators, and policymakers weigh in, it will be interesting to see how this decision shapes future educational strategies. What do you think? Do you support this decision? Give it a thumbs-up if you do!