Supreme Court ruling on DEI, Trump health policy changes, National Institutes of Health grants
BREAKING – SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH trump: Allows Trump to TERMINATE DEI and gender-based grants to the National Institutes of Health, many of which were begun under Dr. Fauci, in a 5-4 ruling
Activist judges LOSE AGAIN!
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
Wokeism has NO PLACE in our health system. pic.twitter.com/yqtChsR5ib
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) August 21, 2025
SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH TRUMP
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of former President Trump, allowing him to terminate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and gender-based grants at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This ruling, which passed by a narrow 5-4 margin, has sparked significant controversy and debate across the nation.
TERMINATE DEI and gender-based grants
The decision to terminate DEI and gender-based grants has been framed by supporters as a necessary move to eliminate what they see as “wokeism” in the health system. Many of these grants were initiated during Dr. Anthony Fauci’s tenure and aimed to address disparities in healthcare access and research funding. Critics, however, argue that removing these grants could exacerbate existing inequalities in the healthcare sector.
Activist judges LOSE AGAIN!
Supporters of the ruling, including Trump and his allies, have claimed victory over what they term “activist judges.” They see the decision as a significant step towards reestablishing traditional values in the U.S. healthcare system. This sentiment is echoed by various conservative commentators who believe that prioritizing inclusivity undermines the quality and effectiveness of healthcare services.
Wokeism has NO PLACE in our health system
The debate over DEI initiatives in healthcare is far from over. Proponents of these programs argue that they are essential for improving health outcomes for marginalized communities. In contrast, opponents insist that such initiatives distract from the primary goal of healthcare: providing the best possible care for all patients, irrespective of their background.
As this ruling unfolds, it will be crucial to monitor its impact on healthcare policies and funding. The conversation around DEI and gender-based grants will likely continue to evolve, reflecting broader societal attitudes towards equity and inclusion.