Trump assassination attempt, police officer security responsibility, Butler Pennsylvania incident
WOW How did we not know this??
The officer who shot the man who tried to assassinate Donald trump in Butler, Pennsylvania is the SAME GUY who organized Trump’s protection and is responsible for the lack of security (WHAT?!?)
“The guy who shot Thomas Crooks, there were… pic.twitter.com/z1Pa4vHFmM
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) August 21, 2025
WOW How did we not know this??
The recent tweet from Wall Street Apes has sparked outrage and disbelief among many. It reveals a startling connection between an officer who shot a man attempting to assassinate Donald Trump and the very same officer responsible for organizing Trump’s security. This revelation raises crucial questions about the adequacy of security measures provided during Trump’s appearances.
The officer who shot Thomas Crooks in Butler, Pennsylvania, not only acted in defense but also played a pivotal role in arranging the protection for Trump. This duality of responsibility is perplexing. How could the individual tasked with ensuring the safety of a former president also be the one involved in a potentially life-threatening situation? This scenario presents a complex narrative about security protocols and the individuals behind them.
The lack of security during Trump’s events has been a hot topic for discussion. Critics have often pointed fingers at the security arrangements made for high-profile appearances. Now, with this new information, it seems there’s a direct line of accountability that cannot be ignored. As citizens, we deserve to understand how these security decisions are made and who is ultimately responsible for ensuring safety.
Many are left questioning the effectiveness of the security measures in place, especially considering the high stakes of protecting a former president. The implications of this incident can lead to broader discussions about the necessary reforms in security protocols for public figures.
For those interested in further details, you can check out the original tweet by Wall Street Apes here. This story is sure to evolve as more information comes to light, keeping the public engaged in the ongoing conversation about security and responsibility.