Clinton Foundation investigation, IRS criminal probe details, 2019 IRS memos
Breaking: IRS began criminal probe into Clinton Foundation in 2019 but then suddenly stopped, memos show https://t.co/OeqLKXM2KD
— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) August 21, 2025
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
Breaking: IRS began criminal probe into Clinton Foundation in 2019 but then suddenly stopped, memos show
In a development that has sparked renewed interest in political accountability, new memos reveal that the IRS initiated a criminal probe into the Clinton Foundation back in 2019. This investigation was aimed at examining potential irregularities within the organization. However, the inquiry was abruptly halted, raising questions about the motives behind the decision. Many people are now asking why the IRS chose to stop the investigation and whether external pressures played a role.
The Clinton Foundation, known for its philanthropic efforts, has often been at the center of controversy, particularly during the 2016 presidential election. With the IRS probe resurfacing, it seems that scrutiny of the foundation’s activities is far from over. Activists and watchdog groups are keen to understand the implications of this investigation and its sudden cessation. Transparency in charitable organizations is crucial, and many believe that thorough investigations are necessary to ensure integrity.
John Solomon, a well-known journalist, broke this story on Twitter, highlighting the inconsistencies in the IRS’s actions. The public’s reaction has been mixed, with some calling for a re-examination of the foundation’s finances. Critics argue that the IRS’s abrupt stop may indicate a lack of accountability for powerful organizations.
As details continue to emerge, the conversation surrounding the Clinton Foundation and its dealings remains relevant. For more on this developing story, check out John Solomon’s Twitter feed for ongoing updates. The implications of these findings could resonate beyond the political landscape, affecting how nonprofit organizations are monitored and held accountable in the future.