election analysis integrity, political bias investigation, electoral commission credibility

Good Morning. Gentle reminder that Sanjay Kumar of CSDS made an error of 35 to 40 percentage points while analysing 4 assembly seats. Clueless interns, fresh out of college, do not commit this blunder. This was a ploy to defame ECI and PM Modi. Warrants a serious investigation.

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

— Tushar Gupta (@Tushar15_) August 20, 2025

Good Morning. Gentle reminder that Sanjay Kumar of CSDS made an error of 35 to 40 percentage points while analysing 4 assembly seats.

In a recent tweet, Tushar Gupta pointed out a significant miscalculation by Sanjay Kumar from the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS). This error, which reportedly spanned 35 to 40 percentage points, raises serious concerns about the analysis of assembly seat data. When such discrepancies occur, they can lead to misguided perceptions and decisions, especially in the politically charged atmosphere surrounding elections.

Clueless interns, fresh out of college, do not commit this blunder.

Gupta’s mention of “clueless interns” suggests that the error was not one that a seasoned analyst would make. It highlights a critical issue within research organizations: the necessity for experienced oversight and quality control. Fresh graduates bring enthusiasm and fresh perspectives, but they may lack the nuanced understanding required for complex political data analysis. It’s essential for organizations like CSDS to ensure that their teams are well-equipped to handle such responsibilities.

This was a ploy to defame ECI and PM Modi.

The implications of this error are profound. Gupta posits that the miscalculation was not merely a mistake but part of a deliberate strategy to undermine the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the reputation of Prime Minister Modi. If true, this allegation warrants a thorough investigation. Investigating the motivations and circumstances surrounding such errors is crucial for maintaining the integrity of political discourse.

Warrants a serious investigation.

As citizens, it’s our responsibility to demand accountability in political analysis. Misleading data can distort public opinion and influence electoral outcomes. Therefore, an investigation into this matter is not just warranted but necessary to uphold democratic values and ensure accurate representation of electoral data.