facial recognition privacy concerns, human rights regulation UK, live surveillance legal challenges
BREAKING: The Met police‘s use of live facial recognition is UNLAWFUL – the UK’s human rights regulator believes
Today we can reveal to you that the EHRC will intervene in a landmark legal challenge to #StopFacialRecognition brought by our director @silkiecarlo & Shaun… pic.twitter.com/zRMw4WUij8
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— Big Brother Watch (@BigBrotherWatch) August 20, 2025
The Met Police’s Use of Live Facial Recognition is Unlawful
Recently, the UK’s human rights regulator declared that the Metropolitan Police’s use of live facial recognition technology is unlawful. This significant finding stems from a legal challenge led by Big Brother Watch, a civil liberties campaign group. The challenge, spearheaded by director Silkie Carlo and Shaun, aims to halt the deployment of facial recognition technology in public spaces.
A Landmark Legal Challenge
The intervention by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) underscores the growing concerns regarding privacy and civil liberties in modern policing. Many advocates argue that live facial recognition infringes on individuals’ rights to privacy and freedom of expression. The EHRC’s involvement is a crucial step in questioning the legality and ethical implications of surveillance technologies used by law enforcement.
Why the Public Should Care
The #StopFacialRecognition movement highlights the broader implications of surveillance technology in our daily lives. As facial recognition systems become more prevalent, the risks of misidentification, data breaches, and misuse of personal information increase. Not only does this technology pose a threat to individual privacy, but it also raises concerns about potential bias and discrimination in its application.
Moving Forward
The legal challenge against the Met Police’s use of live facial recognition is a pivotal moment for civil rights in the UK. As this case progresses, it could set important precedents for how surveillance technologies are regulated. Advocates call for transparency, accountability, and a reevaluation of how law enforcement agencies utilize such intrusive methods.
By engaging in this critical conversation, we can better protect our rights in an increasingly monitored society. Stay updated with developments in this case as it unfolds, as it may significantly shape the future of surveillance and civil liberties in the UK.