Trump administration impact, JD Vance response, Gavin Newsom criticism
JUST IN: JD Vance HITS BACK at Gavin Newsom, who called trump‘s DC takeover an “abuse of power”
“How is it a power grab… when we have already declined m-rders by 35% in NINE DAYS?
How many people are living and breathing today because Donald Trump had the will power to… pic.twitter.com/AeNXmyr4ut
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) August 20, 2025
JD Vance HITS BACK at Gavin Newsom
Recently, JD Vance took a strong stance against California Governor Gavin Newsom’s criticism of Donald Trump’s actions in Washington, D.C. Newsom labeled Trump’s maneuvers as an “abuse of power,” prompting Vance to respond with compelling arguments. He questioned how it could be deemed a power grab when crime rates, particularly murders, have dropped by an impressive 35% in just nine days. This statistic is significant and raises important questions about the effectiveness of leadership during times of crisis.
Declined m-rders by 35% in NINE DAYS
The substantial decrease in murder rates is a pivotal point in Vance’s rebuttal. He emphasizes the tangible outcomes of Trump’s leadership, focusing on the lives saved during a critical period. Vance’s comments highlight the notion that decisive action can lead to immediate and positive changes in public safety. This perspective encourages discussions around governance, accountability, and the metrics used to assess political performance.
How many people are living and breathing today because Donald Trump had the will power to…
The heart of Vance’s argument rests on the impact of political will. By asking how many lives have been positively affected by Trump’s decisions, he shifts the focus from criticism to the results of leadership choices. This approach not only defends Trump but also invites a broader conversation about the consequences of political actions on citizens’ lives.
In a climate where political discourse often becomes polarized, Vance’s response serves as a reminder of the importance of evaluating leaders based on their results rather than rhetoric. As discussions around leadership continue, the statistics and outcomes will remain crucial in shaping public opinion and policy.