Indian military reforms, Rahul Gandhi security statements, Nehru army critique
Decades ago, Nehru said –
“Scrap the army! The police are good Enough to meet our security needs”Today his great grandson Rahul Gandhi says – “ Indian farmers and labourers can Replace Army at border ”
Yes ! Both wanted to scrap the Indian Army pic.twitter.com/zQeRRX41Ka
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— Mona Patel (@MonaPatelT) August 18, 2025
Decades ago, Nehru said – "Scrap the army! The police are good Enough to meet our security needs"
In a bold statement that resonates through time, Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, once suggested scrapping the army, claiming that the police would suffice for national security. This perspective has sparked debate for decades, raising questions about the role of military force in maintaining sovereignty and peace. Nehru’s vision was rooted in a belief in diplomacy and internal security, but critics argue that such views undermine the importance of a robust defense system in a complex geopolitical landscape.
Today his great grandson Rahul Gandhi says – “Indian farmers and labourers can Replace Army at border”
Fast forward to today, and we see a similar sentiment echoed by Rahul Gandhi, Nehru’s great-grandson. He controversially stated that Indian farmers and laborers could effectively replace the army at the borders. This statement has ignited discussions about national security and the role of civilians in defense. Gandhi’s remarks reflect a growing sentiment among some political factions that prioritize social welfare and economic development over military might. However, many argue that a strong military presence is essential for protecting India’s borders and ensuring national integrity.
Yes! Both wanted to scrap the Indian Army
The juxtaposition of these two statements highlights a recurring theme in Indian politics regarding the military’s role in society. While both leaders advocate for alternative forms of security, their views have faced significant backlash. Critics argue that these ideas could compromise national security, especially in a country facing various external threats. As debates continue, the discussion around military versus civilian roles in India’s defense strategy remains as relevant as ever.
For a deeper dive into these evolving perspectives, you can explore the original tweet here.