fake news spread, electoral integrity concerns, opposition narrative strategies
MODUS OPERANDI of CSDS
Spread Fake News
Give Fodder to Opposition
Build False Narrative
Malign ECCasually Apologise after Bluff is called out
Rinse,Repeat
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
You should hang your boots&ask your mentor Yogendra Yadav to do the same,for defaming electoral process https://t.co/slfnUuoXu8
— Sanju Verma (@Sanju_Verma_) August 19, 2025
MODUS OPERANDI of CSDS
The term “MODUS OPERANDI” refers to the typical way an organization operates. In the case of the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), several key strategies have been highlighted that raise concerns about their influence on the electoral process.
Spread Fake News
One of the primary accusations is that CSDS engages in spreading fake news. This tactic not only misinforms the public but also disrupts the integrity of democratic discourse. Misinformation can lead to misguided opinions and decisions during crucial elections.
Give Fodder to Opposition
Additionally, critics suggest that CSDS provides ammunition to opposition parties. By selectively releasing data or statements, they may inadvertently (or otherwise) bolster opposition narratives, which can skew public perception and electoral outcomes.
Build False Narrative
The practice of constructing a false narrative is another alarming aspect. This can involve presenting data in a misleading context or emphasizing certain points while downplaying others. Such narratives can shape voter behavior and ultimately influence the results of elections.
Malign EC
The Election Commission (EC) is a crucial body that ensures free and fair elections. However, there are claims that CSDS has attempted to malign the EC, casting doubts on its credibility. Such actions can erode public trust in the electoral system, which is detrimental to democracy.
Casually Apologise after Bluff is called out
When these tactics are exposed, there seems to be a trend of casual apologies from CSDS. This raises questions about accountability and whether they genuinely take responsibility for their actions or simply brush off the repercussions.
Rinse, Repeat
This cycle of spreading misinformation, creating narratives, and issuing apologies appears to be a continuous pattern. This repetitive behavior can have long-lasting effects on political discourse.
You should hang your boots & ask your mentor Yogendra Yadav to do the same, for defaming electoral process
In light of these concerns, it’s essential for organizations like CSDS to reflect on their practices. The integrity of our electoral process is too important to be compromised.