judicial overreach concerns, legislative power balance, executive authority in governance
BOLD STAND by Modi govt
Centre WARNS Supreme Court that fixing DEADLINES for President & Governors to act on Bills is ‘JUDICIAL OVERREACH’.
Govt says such interference could DESTABILISE the power balance among Legislature, Executive & Judiciary.
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— Megh Updates (@MeghUpdates) August 17, 2025
BOLD STAND by Modi govt
In a significant move, the Modi government has taken a bold stand against the Supreme Court, warning that fixing deadlines for the President and Governors to act on bills amounts to ‘judicial overreach.’ This statement represents a crucial moment in the ongoing dialogue about the separation of powers within India’s political framework.
Centre WARNS Supreme Court
The government’s warning raises important questions about the balance of power among the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary. By asserting that establishing such timelines could destabilize this balance, the Modi administration emphasizes the need for a clear distinction between the roles of these branches of government. This stance is not just a legal argument; it’s a reflection of the broader implications such judicial actions could have on governance.
Judicial Overreach
The concept of judicial overreach isn’t new in Indian politics. It refers to situations where the judiciary is perceived to be stepping beyond its boundaries, potentially intruding into the functions of the legislature or executive. Critics argue that while the judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the Constitution, it should refrain from dictating how the other branches of government operate. The Modi government’s warning serves as a reminder of this delicate balance.
Destabilise the power balance
The implications of this warning are significant. If the judiciary starts imposing deadlines on the executive, it could lead to a situation where the legislative process is compromised. The Modi government argues that such interference might not only disrupt the functioning of the government but could also set a precedent for future judicial interventions. This is a critical moment for understanding the dynamics of power in India and how each branch interacts with one another in the pursuit of governance.