NATO membership expansion, Ukraine security policies, European defense strategies

European leaders are calling for “NATO-like” security guarantees for Ukraine. Why not NATO guarantees? Putin can never be allowed to have a veto over who joins NATO.

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

— Michael McFaul (@McFaul) August 16, 2025

European leaders are calling for “NATO-like” security guarantees for Ukraine

In recent discussions, European leaders are expressing a desire for “NATO-like” security guarantees for Ukraine. This shift highlights the urgent need for robust support for Ukraine amid ongoing tensions with Russia. The notion of “NATO-like” guarantees suggests a framework that might provide Ukraine with significant defense assurances without granting full NATO membership, which remains a contentious issue.

Why not NATO guarantees?

The question arises: why not pursue full NATO guarantees for Ukraine? The answer lies in the complex geopolitical landscape shaped by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Many experts argue that allowing Putin any form of veto over NATO expansions undermines the alliance’s core principles. Ensuring that countries like Ukraine can pursue NATO membership without external interference is crucial for maintaining the integrity and unity of the alliance.

Putin can never be allowed to have a veto over who joins NATO

By asserting that “Putin can never be allowed to have a veto over who joins NATO,” commentators like Michael McFaul emphasize the importance of defending democratic choices. Every nation should have the autonomy to decide its alliances without fear of retaliation or pressure from Russia. This sentiment resonates strongly in the current climate, as nations seek to bolster their security in the face of aggressive posturing from Moscow.

In essence, the call for “NATO-like” security guarantees for Ukraine reflects a pragmatic approach to a challenging situation. It aims to strengthen Ukraine’s defenses while navigating the complex realities of international relations. As discussions evolve, it’s vital for global leaders to prioritize the sovereignty of nations and resist any attempts at coercion from authoritarian regimes.