political speech controversy, local government accountability, social justice disparities

I feel sick.
Labour councillor told crowd to “cut their throats” found not guilty.
He didn’t mean it literally.
Lucy Connolly didn’t mean it literally either.
But Lucy is white and married to a Tory councillor.
2-tier justice.
https://t.co/wISJnY6loP

• Check out these discounted items on Amazon

— Allison Pearson (@AllisonPearson) August 15, 2025

I feel sick.

The recent case involving a Labour councillor who told a crowd to “cut their throats” and was found not guilty has sparked outrage and confusion. Many people feel that there’s a double standard when it comes to how justice is served. While the councillor claimed he didn’t mean it literally, his words have raised serious questions about accountability and the implications of such statements.

Labour councillor told crowd to “cut their throats” found not guilty.

This incident highlights a troubling trend in political discourse, where inflammatory language is often dismissed without consequence. Critics argue that such rhetoric can lead to real-world violence and should be treated more seriously. The phrase “cut their throats” certainly isn’t something to be taken lightly, regardless of intent.

He didn’t mean it literally.

When the councillor stated he didn’t mean it literally, it seemed to downplay the severity of the situation. This raises an important question: how do we balance free speech with the responsibility that comes with it? In a society that values open dialogue, it’s crucial to consider the impact of our words, especially when they can incite fear or harm.

Lucy Connolly didn’t mean it literally either.

The case of Lucy Connolly adds another layer to the conversation. As a white woman married to a Tory councillor, her situation has been viewed through a different lens. Some argue that her ethnicity and political connections have influenced the perception and handling of her case, pointing towards a potential bias in the justice system.

But Lucy is white and married to a Tory councillor.

This notion of a “2-tier justice” system is alarming. It raises concerns about how individuals are treated based on their background, political affiliations, or public image. The idea that justice could be influenced by race or political ties is something that deserves our attention and scrutiny.

2-tier justice.

In a world where equality and fairness are paramount, we must challenge these discrepancies and advocate for a justice system that holds everyone to the same standard, regardless of their status. It’s a conversation worth having, and one that could lead to meaningful change if we choose to engage with it seriously.