DOJ FISA abuse, FBI surveillance controversy, illegal FISA warrants
Well well well…
DOJ admitted 4 of 4 FISAs were illegal.
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
They all knew and signed anyway.
DOJ/FBI Approved FISA:
Yates
Boente
Comey
McCabe
RosensteinJudges Approved FISA:
Dearie
Collyer
Conway
Mosman“No Dossier, no FISA warrants.” -McCabe
Conspiracy.
All in on it. pic.twitter.com/C2xumPdOJA
— C3 (@C_3C_3) August 14, 2025
DOJ Admitted 4 of 4 FISAs Were Illegal
In a startling revelation, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has acknowledged that all four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants were illegal. This admission raises serious questions about the integrity of the DOJ and FBI processes in approving these warrants. It’s alarming to think that key figures like Yates, Boente, Comey, McCabe, and Rosenstein were aware of the illegality yet proceeded to sign off on these documents.
They All Knew and Signed Anyway
The implications of this acknowledgment are profound. The individuals involved, from DOJ officials to judges like Dearie, Collyer, Conway, and Mosman, seemingly turned a blind eye to the legalities. This collective oversight paints a troubling picture of a system that should prioritize justice and legality. The fact that they collectively approved these FISA warrants despite knowing their questionable validity is a serious breach of trust.
DOJ/FBI Approved FISA
The list of those who approved these FISA warrants reads like a who’s who of high-ranking officials. The involvement of figures such as Comey and McCabe, who have had prominent roles in public discussions about integrity and accountability, is particularly concerning. McCabe’s statement, "No Dossier, no FISA warrants," underscores the critical role that the now-infamous Steele dossier played in this controversy.
Judges Approved FISA
The judges who approved these warrants also share a significant responsibility. Their decisions are supposed to be based on evidence and legality, but this situation raises questions about their diligence and judgment. With all parties seemingly complicit, it’s hard not to view this as a larger conspiracy.
“Conspiracy. All in on it.”
This situation has led many to speculate about the motives behind these actions. Were these approvals a result of political pressure or a failure of the system? As public scrutiny increases, it’s essential to demand transparency and accountability from those in positions of power. The integrity of our legal systems depends on it. For more insights, check out the original tweet by C3.