
USAID funding cuts, Trump administration legal battles, judicial dissent in funding decisions
BREAKING: In a 2-1 decision, the appellate panel REVERSED order that blocked trump admin from cutting funding to USAID
This ruling is a SIGNIFICANT win in the efforts to dissolve USAID
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
Biden appointed Judge Florence Pan, dissented pic.twitter.com/c4tkpFwOlD
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 13, 2025
BREAKING: In a 2-1 decision, the appellate panel REVERSED order that blocked Trump admin from cutting funding to USAID
In a pivotal ruling, an appellate panel has overturned a previous order that prevented the Trump administration from slashing funding to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). This 2-1 decision marks a significant victory for those seeking to dismantle the agency, which has long been a focal point of debate regarding foreign aid and government spending. The implications of this ruling could reshape the landscape of international assistance and the role of USAID in global development efforts.
This ruling is a SIGNIFICANT win in the efforts to dissolve USAID
The appellate ruling signals a shift in policy direction that may align with the views of many conservatives who advocate for reducing government expenditure on foreign aid. Critics of USAID argue that the agency often mismanages funds and lacks accountability, calling for reforms or outright dissolution. Supporters, however, emphasize the importance of USAID in promoting democracy, health, and education worldwide. The reversal of the order not only allows funding cuts but also opens the door for further legislative actions aimed at restructuring or eliminating USAID entirely.
Biden appointed Judge Florence Pan, dissented
Interestingly, the dissent came from Judge Florence Pan, who was appointed by President Biden. Her disagreement highlights the ongoing ideological divide within the judiciary regarding government programs and their effectiveness. As discussions about the future of USAID unfold, this ruling will likely fuel debates in Congress and among the public about the role of federal agencies in international aid.
For more details, you can follow the conversation on platforms like Twitter. The ongoing developments around USAID and its funding will undoubtedly remain a hot topic in American political discourse.