dog advocacy, political hypocrisy, social media influence
Perhaps the most phony, double-faced person on Twitter.
She used to go all guns blazing against stray dogs, calling them a “death threat to ordinary people,” but the moment she realised Congress was politicising it against the BJP, she flipped to preaching love and coexistence. pic.twitter.com/AVTSlyyNwD
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— THE SKIN DOCTOR (@theskindoctor13) August 12, 2025
Perhaps the most phony, double-faced person on Twitter
In the fast-paced world of social media, opinions can shift dramatically, sometimes leaving followers bewildered. A recent tweet from The Skin Doctor highlights this phenomenon, referring to someone as perhaps the most phony, double-faced person on Twitter. This individual had previously taken a strong stance against stray dogs, labeling them a “death threat to ordinary people.”
She used to go all guns blazing against stray dogs
It’s fascinating how public figures can change their narratives based on political climates. Initially, this person vehemently opposed stray dogs, sparking discussions about safety and public health. Her rhetoric was intense, aiming to rally support against what she perceived as a growing menace. For anyone following the discourse, her stance seemed unwavering and uncompromising.
But the moment she realised Congress was politicising it against the BJP
However, the tide turned when she noticed that her strong anti-stray dog sentiments were being used politically against the BJP by Congress. This realization led her to flip her narrative entirely. Instead of maintaining her previous position, she began promoting messages of love and coexistence with stray animals. This drastic change raised eyebrows, prompting many to question her authenticity and motives.
She flipped to preaching love and coexistence
This shift from a hardline approach to a more compassionate viewpoint illustrates how the political landscape can influence personal beliefs and public statements. It serves as a reminder of the complexities of social media interactions, where the lines between genuine advocacy and political strategy often blur.
For those interested in the intricacies of social media dynamics and political discourse, following such developments can provide valuable insights. Engaging with both sides of the argument helps foster a well-rounded understanding of the issues at play.