security clearance controversy, national security advisor scrutiny, political accountability in intelligence
Fantastic question @RepLuna!
Also, why does @SenAdamSchiff’s Palestinian jihadist National Security advisor Maher Bitar, who participated in the Russia collusion hoax & whose name appears on the documents @DNIGabbard declassified still have a security clearance?
Very alarming. https://t.co/aZDPrbQxXL
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) August 11, 2025
Fantastic question @RepLuna!
In today’s political landscape, questions about national security and personnel decisions are more critical than ever. Recently, Laura Loomer raised an eyebrow regarding Maher Bitar, who serves as a National Security advisor under @SenAdamSchiff. Bitar’s past involvement in the contentious Russia collusion investigation has been a topic of discussion. Many are asking: why does he still have a security clearance? This question is especially relevant given the heightened scrutiny around national security advisors and their qualifications.
Also, why does @SenAdamSchiff’s Palestinian jihadist National Security advisor Maher Bitar, who participated in the Russia collusion hoax & whose name appears on the documents @DNIGabbard declassified still have a security clearance?
With the heightened tensions surrounding U.S. foreign policy and security, many citizens are understandably alarmed. The fact that someone with a controversial history remains in a position of power raises significant concerns about transparency and accountability in government. The implications of having such advisors can affect not just policy but also public trust in government institutions.
Being informed about who is making decisions that impact national security is vital for citizens. As discussions like these unfold on platforms like Twitter, they encourage us to think critically about the qualifications and backgrounds of those in charge.
It’s essential to keep asking these questions and to demand the answers we deserve. The landscape of national security is complex, but transparency should always be a priority.