incitement of violence, political protests DC, curfew response actions
Leftist illegally calls for Democrats to start “burning” and “destroying” stuff in response to the new curfew in DC.
This is blatant incitement of violence.
He needs to be arrested now.
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
(rollnunderthebus on TT) pic.twitter.com/HsSK94MeWM
— Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) August 11, 2025
Leftist illegally calls for Democrats to start “burning” and “destroying” stuff in response to the new curfew in DC.
In a recent tweet that has sparked widespread controversy, a leftist figure openly called for Democrats to engage in acts of violence, specifically “burning” and “destroying” in response to a new curfew imposed in Washington, D.C. This kind of rhetoric raises serious concerns about public safety and the potential for inciting unrest. The call for destruction, especially during a time when tensions are already high, is not just reckless; it’s alarming.
This is blatant incitement of violence.
Incitement of violence refers to the act of encouraging others to engage in unlawful or violent behavior. When individuals in positions of influence make statements that could lead to chaos, it’s essential to address the issue promptly. The tweet in question has drawn criticism for its dangerous implications, especially considering the current climate of political division. Many are calling for accountability, as such statements can have real-world consequences.
He needs to be arrested now.
Calls for immediate action against those who incite violence are gaining traction. Advocates argue that allowing such rhetoric to go unchecked could embolden others to act on similar urges. It is vital for authorities to respond decisively to ensure that public discourse remains civil and constructive. Arresting individuals who promote violence can serve as a deterrent, reinforcing the idea that inciting unrest will not be tolerated in a democratic society.
In conclusion, as discussions about curfews and civil liberties continue, it’s essential that we promote dialogue over destruction. Respectful conversation is key to addressing grievances without resorting to violence.