Obituary and Cause of death news:
GPT-4o (RIP) Still Dominates Despite Its Demise
Claude Holds Strong; GPT-5 Fails to Impress
In a recent tweet by George Pu, intriguing data highlights the performance of various AI models. Despite being "dead," GPT-4o leads with 35.4%, demonstrating its enduring effectiveness. Claude follows with a solid 31.3%, while the much-hyped GPT-5 lags behind at 20.8%. This comparison underscores the distinction between product shipping and marketing hype in the AI landscape. The results prompt a discussion on the real-world performance of AI technologies versus their promotional narratives. To delve deeper into these insights, check out the original tweet here. Stay informed about AI advancements and their implications!
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
Interesting results:
GPT-4o (RIP) is still winning at 35.4% even though it’s dead.
Claude holding strong at 31.3%.
GPT-5 at only 20.8% after all that hype.
Tells you everything about shipping vs. marketing. https://t.co/e6eIkrU97W
— George Pu (@TheGeorgePu) August 10, 2025
Interesting results:
There’s a lot of buzz in the AI community lately, and one recent tweet by George Pu highlights some interesting results that caught my attention. The tweet reveals that GPT-4o (RIP) is still winning at an impressive 35.4%, even though it’s technically no longer active. Isn’t that wild? It just goes to show how impressive its performance was even in its prime, and it seems like its legacy still resonates with users.
GPT-4o (RIP) is still winning at 35.4% even though it’s dead.
What makes this even more fascinating is the fact that Claude is holding strong at 31.3%. This suggests that while new technologies are emerging, there’s still a strong preference for established models that have proven their worth. Claude’s ability to maintain a solid percentage indicates that users value reliability and performance over the latest trends.
Claude holding strong at 31.3%.
Now let’s talk about GPT-5, which is sitting at only 20.8% after all that hype. It’s a stark reminder of the difference between delivering a solid product and merely marketing it. All the excitement around GPT-5 didn’t translate into user satisfaction, which really makes you think about the importance of substance over style.
GPT-5 at only 20.8% after all that hype.
Overall, these results tell you everything about shipping vs. marketing. In the fast-paced world of AI, it’s clear that building a reliable product is just as crucial—if not more so—than how well you market it. So, what’s your take? Are you more inclined to stick with a tried-and-true model or chase the latest innovations?