“UC Davis Prof Threatens Zionist Journalists — Still Employed with Full Salary!”
academic freedom, hate speech accountability, university employment policies
—————–

UC Davis professor Jemma Decristo sparked controversy just days after October 7th by threatening Zionist journalists and their families on social media, using violent emojis. Despite the serious nature of her threats, she remains employed at UC Davis, earning an annual salary of $116,800. The incident has raised significant concerns about the university’s stance on faculty conduct and freedom of speech. Critics are calling for accountability and transparency regarding the university’s actions in response to Decristo’s statements. This situation highlights the ongoing debate surrounding academic freedom and the responsibilities of educators in a polarized political climate.

Just three days after October 7th, UC Davis professor Jemma Decristo threatened to murder Zionist journalists and their children, complete with knife and blood emojis.
She’s still on staff.
Still drawing $116,800/year.
Still protected by UC Davis.

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

RT this. Share it. Tag UC… pic.twitter.com/lQJO5ntEpp

— Jews Fight Back (@JewsFightBack) August 4, 2025

Just three days after October 7th, UC Davis professor Jemma Decristo threatened to murder Zionist journalists and their children, complete with knife and blood emojis.

In a disturbing incident that has sparked widespread outrage, UC Davis professor Jemma Decristo made alarming threats against Zionist journalists just days after October 7th. Her posts included violent imagery, such as knife and blood emojis, which raised significant concerns about safety and accountability in academic environments. It’s hard to fathom how such threats could come from someone in a position of influence, especially within a respected institution like the University of California, Davis.

She’s still on staff.

What’s even more shocking is that despite these threats, Decristo remains employed at UC Davis. The lack of immediate action against her has left many questioning the university’s commitment to maintaining a safe and respectful academic atmosphere. When educators express violent sentiments, it’s crucial that institutions respond decisively to protect their community. The silence from UC Davis in this matter is undeniably troubling and raises questions about their values and priorities.

Still drawing $116,800/year.

It’s mind-boggling to think that while Decristo continues to threaten individuals online, she is still drawing a substantial salary of $116,800 per year. This situation highlights a significant disconnect between the actions of university faculty and the accountability mechanisms that should be in place. For students and faculty who value a safe and inclusive environment, it’s concerning to see someone who has made such threats continue to receive a paycheck from taxpayer funds.

Still protected by UC Davis.

The fact that Decristo appears to be protected by UC Davis adds another layer of complexity to this situation. Many people are left wondering what message this sends about the university’s stance on free speech versus the promotion of violence. Academic freedom is essential, but it should never come at the expense of safety and civility. It’s critical for universities to set clear boundaries and ensure that faculty who cross those lines are held accountable.

RT this. Share it. Tag UC.

The incident involving Jemma Decristo has ignited a firestorm on social media, with calls for action echoing across platforms. Activists and concerned citizens are urging people to RT this, share the message, and tag UC Davis to demand accountability and transparency. In today’s interconnected world, the power of social media can no longer be underestimated; it can serve as a vehicle for change and a way to hold institutions accountable for their actions.

This alarming situation involving UC Davis professor Jemma Decristo serves as a crucial reminder of the responsibilities that come with academic positions. As the controversy continues to unfold, it’s vital for both the university and the broader community to engage in meaningful dialogue about safety, accountability, and the role of educators in shaping a respectful academic environment.