“Shocking Revelations: Tulsi Gabbard Exposes Alleged Election Fraud Scandal!”
election integrity concerns, voting machine security issues, political accountability in 2025
—————–
Roger Stone recently criticized claims about the 2020 election, suggesting it was fraudulent and that a “vegetable” could not have received 81 million votes. He asserts that Tulsi Gabbard has evidence proving election machines were rigged. Stone’s comments reflect ongoing debates surrounding election integrity and the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential results. This controversy continues to fuel discussions in political circles and among supporters who question the electoral process. For those interested in election integrity, Stone’s statements and Gabbard’s purported evidence could offer insights into prevailing narratives. Stay updated on election news and analysis for a deeper understanding of these issues.
Can you believe this laughable horse shit from the people who actually stole the 2020 election? I’m sorry but a vegetable did not get 81 million votes and now Tulsi Gabbert has the proof that the machines were rigged. https://t.co/Xn6MNzspCV
— Roger Stone (@RogerJStoneJr) August 4, 2025
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
Can you believe this laughable horse shit from the people who actually stole the 2020 election?
In recent discussions surrounding the 2020 election, it’s hard not to come across some wild claims. One noteworthy moment came from political consultant Roger Stone, who shared his thoughts on social media. He stated, “Can you believe this laughable horse shit from the people who actually stole the 2020 election?” This statement stirred up quite the conversation and left many wondering about the integrity of the electoral process. Given the political climate, it’s essential to examine the various narratives that have emerged since then.
I’m sorry but a vegetable did not get 81 million votes
Roger Stone’s remark about a “vegetable” not receiving 81 million votes was directed at Joe Biden, who garnered a historic number of ballots in the 2020 election. This line of attack reflects a broader sentiment among some critics who question Biden’s appeal and ability to connect with voters. The term “vegetable” is clearly intended to undermine Biden’s capabilities. As people dissect these claims, it’s crucial to consider the data and facts surrounding voter turnout and engagement. Many studies have shown that the 2020 election saw unprecedented participation, leading to Biden’s significant vote tally. For those interested in understanding the dynamics of voter turnout, a study from the Pew Research Center provides valuable insights.
And now Tulsi Gabbard has the proof that the machines were rigged
Another layer to the debate emerged when former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard was mentioned as having proof regarding alleged election fraud. This claim adds fuel to the fire for those who believe there was an issue with voting machines during the election. The conversation around voting technology and its security has been ongoing, especially after the election. Various reports and investigations have examined these claims, and while some have found irregularities, many have also concluded that there was no widespread fraud that could have changed the outcome. For a more in-depth look at the security of voting machines, resources from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) are quite informative.
What’s next for election integrity discussions?
As we navigate these conversations, it’s essential to approach them with a critical eye. While claims like those made by Stone and Gabbard resonate with certain audiences, the broader picture often tells a different story. Engaging with factual information and reputable analyses is crucial for anyone looking to understand the complexities of election integrity. Numerous organizations, including the Brennan Center for Justice, have worked to provide balanced perspectives on these topics.
It’s clear that discussions around the 2020 election will continue to evolve. Social media platforms amplify these narratives, making it vital for individuals to seek out reliable information and form their own opinions based on facts, not just sensational claims. As citizens, we have the responsibility to engage thoughtfully in these discussions, ensuring that our democracy remains strong and resilient.