“Is Journalism dead? The Predictability of trump Coverage Sparks Outrage!”
journalism integrity, political bias in media, trust in news sources
—————–
In a recent tweet, journalist Greta Van Susteren expressed her concerns about the current state of journalism, particularly regarding coverage of Donald Trump. She stated that before reading a news article, she checks the author’s name and feels she can predict its content, indicating a troubling trend of bias among journalists. Van Susteren believes that journalists should maintain neutrality and rise above political conflicts rather than taking sides. This commentary raises essential questions about journalistic integrity and the importance of unbiased reporting in today’s media landscape, highlighting a growing need for objective journalism to restore public trust.
Before I read a news story about Trump, I look who wrote it. After reading the name, I don’t have to read it. I know what it will say. Journalists are so predicable these days. That is not good for journalism. They should be ‘above’ the fight, and not taking sides.
— Greta Van Susteren (@greta) August 4, 2025
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
Before I read a news story about Trump, I look who wrote it.
Greta Van Susteren recently shared her thoughts on Twitter regarding how she approaches reading news about Donald Trump. She mentioned that the first thing she does is check the byline of the article. It’s an interesting habit, and many of us can relate. Do you ever find yourself doing the same? When it comes to Trump-related news, knowing who wrote it can save you time. If you recognize a journalist’s name and feel confident about their perspective, it can be a real game-changer. It’s like a shortcut to understanding the slant of the article before you even dive in.
After reading the name, I don’t have to read it.
This part of Van Susteren’s tweet resonates with a lot of readers today. In an era where media bias seems more pronounced than ever, many people feel they can predict the content of a news article based solely on the writer’s identity. Whether it’s a well-known liberal or conservative journalist, the expectation is often that the article will reflect their preconceived ideas. This predictability can lead to a disconnect between journalists and their audience, raising questions about the integrity of journalism itself. How many of us have skipped the article altogether because we knew it wouldn’t provide a balanced view?
I know what it will say.
Van Susteren’s sentiment raises valid concerns about media predictability. When journalists begin to appear predictable, it diminishes the credibility of their work. Readers may start to wonder if they are receiving the full story or just a curated version that aligns with a specific agenda. This isn’t just about Trump; it’s a broader issue that affects how we consume news. In a world inundated with information, having reliable sources that offer diverse perspectives is essential. If readers feel they already know what an article will say, the motivation to engage with the news diminishes.
Journalists are so predictable these days.
The predictability of journalists can be attributed to various factors, including political affiliations and the growing influence of social media. Many journalists have built their brands around specific viewpoints, and this can heavily influence their reporting. While it’s important for journalists to have personal opinions, it’s equally important for them to maintain objectivity, especially when covering divisive figures like Trump. When journalists begin to take sides openly, it can create an echo chamber where opposing views are drowned out. This isn’t good for journalism or for society as a whole.
That is not good for journalism.
The essence of journalism lies in its ability to present facts and offer a platform for diverse viewpoints. When predictability takes over, it undermines the core values of the profession. Journalism should strive to inform, educate, and challenge readers, not merely reinforce existing beliefs. For the health of our democracy, it’s crucial that journalists remain committed to unbiased reporting. After all, a well-informed public is the foundation of a thriving society.
They should be ‘above’ the fight, and not taking sides.
Ultimately, Van Susteren’s call for journalists to be “above the fight” is a reminder of what the profession should strive for. Journalists have a responsibility to present the facts in a fair and balanced manner, allowing readers to form their own opinions. While passion in reporting is important, it should not overshadow the commitment to truth. As consumers of news, we should advocate for transparency, accountability, and a return to unbiased reporting. In doing so, we can ensure that journalism continues to play a vital role in our democracy.
For more insights on this topic, check out the [original tweet by Greta Van Susteren](https://twitter.com/greta/status/1952364567582933045?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw).