Gavin Newsom Breaks Promise: Palisades Land Grab Sparks Fierce Backlash!
land use policies, urban development controversy, housing crisis solutions
—————–
In a recent tweet, Richard Grenell criticized California Governor Gavin Newsom for allegedly breaking his promise not to utilize land in the Palisades, which was devastated by wildfires, for low-income housing developments. Grenell claims that this decision, supported by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, is altering the character of the Palisades and Malibu to advance a “woke agenda.” The controversy highlights ongoing tensions surrounding housing policies and urban development in California. This situation underscores the complexities of balancing community needs with the demand for affordable housing, raising questions about political accountability and local governance.
. @GavinNewsom lied.
He said he wouldn’t grab the land where homes burned down in the Palisades to build low-income housing facilities – but he and Karen Bass just did.
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
They are changing the character of the Palisades and Malibu to fit their woke agenda. They don’t care what…
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) July 17, 2025
@GavinNewsom lied.
When it comes to political promises, nothing stirs up a storm quite like broken commitments. Recently, Gavin Newsom made headlines with claims that he would not seize land in the Palisades where homes tragically burned down. However, he, along with Karen Bass, has seemingly taken a different route, raising eyebrows across the state. This situation has left many residents feeling betrayed and concerned about the future of their community.
He said he wouldn’t grab the land where homes burned down in the Palisades to build low-income housing facilities – but he and Karen Bass just did.
As the dust settles from the devastating wildfires, the decision to build low-income housing in the Palisades has sparked outrage among locals. Many believed that the land should be treated with respect, honoring those who lost their homes. Instead, it feels like a betrayal. Critics argue that such actions are a blatant disregard for the community’s character and history. The promise to avoid this kind of development is now seen as empty rhetoric, leaving many to question the integrity of their leaders.
They are changing the character of the Palisades and Malibu to fit their woke agenda.
The transformation of the Palisades and Malibu is not just about housing; it’s about the broader implications of what this change means for these iconic areas. Critics, including political figures like Richard Grenell, have voiced their concerns that this move is part of a larger agenda aimed at reshaping communities to align with progressive ideals. The term “woke agenda” has become a rallying cry for those who feel that essential values and traditions are being overlooked in favor of social engineering.
They don’t care what…
What many residents are feeling is a sense of loss, not just of homes but of identity. The Palisades and Malibu have long been known for their scenic beauty, affluent lifestyles, and tight-knit communities. The introduction of low-income housing in these neighborhoods raises questions about the balance between inclusivity and preserving the unique character that residents hold dear. It’s more than just a housing issue; it’s about the future of these cherished communities.
As the debate rages on, it’s crucial for community members to voice their opinions. Engaging in local forums and discussions can help residents express their concerns and push back against decisions made without their input. It’s a time for unity and action, as the trajectory of the Palisades and Malibu hangs in the balance. Whether you agree with the need for low-income housing or believe it disrupts the character of the area, it’s essential to stay informed and involved.
Ultimately, the actions of leaders like @GavinNewsom and Karen Bass will shape the future of these neighborhoods. Whether this move is seen as a step towards progress or a misstep in governance will depend on the community’s response. As the saying goes, “Together, we stand; divided, we fall.” So, let’s engage in this conversation and advocate for what we believe in.