“New Evidence Suggests CIA’s Hidden Role in JFK Assassination Cover-Up!”
Warren Commission investigation, CIA involvement in JFK assassination, alternative history scenarios
—————–

In a thought-provoking tweet, journalist Jefferson Morley suggests that if the Washington Post had published a specific story on July 15, 1964, the Warren Commission’s investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy would have taken a significantly different direction. Morley argues that such coverage would have shifted the focus toward CIA officers rather than solely on Lee Harvey Oswald, potentially leading to a more thorough investigation. This perspective raises questions about media influence on historical events and the implications of investigative journalism. Explore more about the intersection of media, politics, and history in Morley’s insightful commentary.

Imagine if the Washington Post had run this story on July 15, 1964. …..The Warren Commission’s investigation would have been totally different. …..It would have focused the investigation on CIA officers, not just Oswald. It would have forced a real investigation. pic.twitter.com/a75yRFaj0A

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE.  Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502

— Jefferson Morley (@jeffersonmorley) July 15, 2025

Imagine if the Washington Post had run this story on July 15, 1964

Picture it: July 15, 1964. The Washington Post, one of America’s leading newspapers, publishes a groundbreaking story that changes everything about the investigation into President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. Jefferson Morley, a notable journalist and author, recently posed this hypothetical scenario on Twitter, suggesting that if such a story had emerged back then, the entire trajectory of the Warren Commission’s investigation would have been significantly altered. Curious, right?

The idea is that the investigation wouldn’t have solely focused on Lee Harvey Oswald. Instead, it would have turned its attention toward CIA officers and their potential involvement. This shift could have sparked a more thorough investigation, leading to a deeper understanding of the events surrounding that fateful day in Dallas.

The Warren Commission’s Investigation Would Have Been Totally Different

The Warren Commission was established to investigate the assassination of JFK, but its findings have been the subject of much debate and skepticism. Many believe that the Commission was limited in its scope, focusing primarily on Oswald as the lone assassin. But what if the Washington Post had published a story highlighting the CIA’s possible connections to the assassination?

Morley asserts that this would have forced the Commission to expand its investigation beyond Oswald and delve into the murky waters of intelligence operations, covert actions, and the political climate of the 1960s. This could have revealed more about the inner workings of the CIA, potentially uncovering connections that might have otherwise remained hidden.

It Would Have Focused the Investigation on CIA Officers, Not Just Oswald

Imagine a scenario where the CIA’s role was scrutinized alongside Oswald’s actions. The agency has a long history of controversial operations, including attempts to undermine foreign governments and political figures. If the Washington Post had pointed fingers in 1964, it would have led to a national conversation about the extent of the CIA’s involvement in domestic affairs.

This isn’t just a theoretical exercise. Historical context matters. The 1960s were rife with conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination, many of which implicated the CIA. A different approach from the media could have paved the way for a more comprehensive investigation, one that acknowledged the complexity of political machinations at play.

It Would Have Forced a Real Investigation

The implications of Morley’s tweet are profound. A more aggressive journalistic approach could have galvanized public interest and pushed for a more rigorous investigation. Instead of settling for a narrative that painted Oswald as a solitary figure, journalists could have demanded accountability from the intelligence community.

In the digital age, we often see how powerful journalism can shape narratives and influence investigations. If the Washington Post had taken a bold stance back in 1964, we might have seen the same kind of accountability today, leading to a clearer understanding of what truly happened on that tragic day.

Ultimately, Morley’s reflection encourages us to think critically about the role of media in shaping historical narratives. The past is full of “what ifs,” but this particular scenario serves as a reminder of the importance of thorough and fearless journalism in uncovering the truth.

Curious minds can explore more about this discussion and its implications through [Jefferson Morley’s Twitter](https://twitter.com/jeffersonmorley/status/1945090984301260807?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw), where he continues to engage in conversations about JFK and the complexities of history.