Sedition Unveiled: Tanden’s Secret Rule During Crisis! — sedition in U.S. history, Neera Tanden political influence, Capitol riot accountability 2025

By | July 15, 2025
0 Comment

“Revelations of Sedition: Tanden’s Secret Rule Amidst Biden’s Incapacity!”
sedition in U.S. history, Neera Tanden leadership controversy, 2020 election aftermath
—————–

On November 3, 2020, a significant political event unfolded in the U.S., as reported by The New York Times. During this period, with President Biden incapacitated, Neera Tanden allegedly assumed control of the country. Controversial decisions included the use of an autopen for signing pardons directed at the January 6th Committee, General Milley, Nancy Pelosi’s Capitol police, and Dr. Fauci. This tweet by Pamela Hensley raises questions about accountability and calls for arrests of key figures involved. This situation highlights ongoing debates regarding governance and political integrity in America, emphasizing the need for transparency in leadership.

The New York Times confirms: On Nov 3, 2020, the greatest act of sedition in U.S. history began.

It’s wild to think about the events that shaped the United States during the 2020 election season. According to a tweet from Pamela Hensley, the *New York Times* confirmed that on November 3, 2020, the greatest act of sedition in U.S. history began. This claim has stirred quite a bit of debate, so let’s delve deeper into the implications of these statements and what they mean for our understanding of those tumultuous days.

With Biden incapacitated, Neera Tanden ran the country.

One of the most striking claims made by Hensley is that during a critical period, President Biden was incapacitated, and Neera Tanden took the reins of the country. Tanden, a well-known political figure, was nominated for various roles in the Biden administration but has faced her share of controversies. The idea that she managed the nation during such a pivotal moment raises questions about political dynamics and decision-making in the absence of a sitting president. Did she truly wield that much power, or is this a narrative being constructed for political gain?

Pardons signed by autopen went to J6 Committee, Milley, Pelosi’s Capitol police, and Fauci.

The tweet also mentions pardons signed by autopen, including those for the January 6 Committee, General Milley, Capitol Police, and Dr. Fauci. This brings to light the broader context of legal and governmental maneuvers that occurred during what many saw as a chaotic transition of power. The use of autopen raises questions about accountability and the authenticity of such actions. Were these pardons legitimate, and what were the motivations behind them? These queries are essential as they influence public perception of the government’s integrity and transparency.

It’s time to arrest them all.

This provocative statement has ignited conversations across social media platforms, with many people weighing in on who should be held accountable for their actions during this period. Calls for arrest suggest a deep-seated frustration and a desire for justice among segments of the population. It reflects a polarized political climate where accusations and calls for action can escalate quickly.

The implications of Hensley’s claims can’t be understated. They highlight the fractures in our political landscape and the varying narratives that different groups subscribe to. As citizens, it’s essential to sift through these claims, seek reliable information, and form our own conclusions about what happened during that pivotal moment in U.S. history.

In the end, the events surrounding November 3, 2020, and the subsequent claims made by figures like Pamela Hensley underscore the complexity of modern political discourse. It’s a reminder that what we believe and understand about our leaders and their actions can shape the very fabric of our democracy. So, let’s stay informed and engaged, because history is still being written, and we all play a part in it.

For more detailed discussions about these claims, you can check out articles from reputable sources like [The New York Times](https://www.nytimes.com) and other news outlets that provide in-depth analysis and coverage on the political landscape during and after the 2020 elections.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *