“Engineered Starvation: A Controversial First in Settler-Colonial Genocide Trials”
settler colonialism accountability, international court genocide trial, engineered starvation human rights
—————–
In a powerful statement, Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, highlights the grave issue of engineered starvation as a method of genocide, drawing parallels with historical settler-colonial atrocities. This marks a significant moment, as it is the first time such a settler-colonial genocide is being addressed in an international court. However, Albanese warns that justice will likely arrive too late. Her comments underscore the urgent need for international awareness and action against these crimes. For further insights, read Albanese’s full tweet here.
Engineered starvation as part of the intentional destruction of a group as such. This is so familiar to other settler-colonial genocides; yet, this is the first settler-colonial genocide to land before an intl court.
But even in this case justice will be served late. It is… https://t.co/YrzLZlohRO— Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt (@FranceskAlbs) July 15, 2025
- YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. Waverly Hills Hospital's Horror Story: The Most Haunted Room 502
Engineered Starvation as Part of the Intentional Destruction of a Group as Such
Engineered starvation is a harrowing tactic that has been utilized in various genocides throughout history. Francesca Albanese, a UN Special Rapporteur, recently highlighted this issue, pointing out that it forms part of the intentional destruction of a group. This is not just an abstract concept; it’s a reality faced by many under settler-colonial regimes. The chilling familiarity of engineered starvation resonates with the historical traumas inflicted on countless communities, where food and resources are weaponized to eliminate entire groups.
When we talk about engineered starvation, we’re not just discussing scarcity — we’re talking about a deliberate strategy aimed at dismantling the very fabric of a community. It’s a tactic that has been observed in other settler-colonial genocides, where the goal is to erase a culture, population, and identity. Albanese notes that this particular case marks the first settler-colonial genocide to be brought before an international court. This is monumental, yet it also raises concerns about the effectiveness and timeliness of justice.
This is So Familiar to Other Settler-Colonial Genocides
The comparison to other settler-colonial genocides isn’t just a passing thought; it highlights a pattern of behavior that has persisted throughout history. From the Native American experience in the United States to the Aboriginal peoples in Australia, engineered starvation has been a recurring theme. It’s not merely a historical footnote — it’s a methodical approach that has been used to control, dominate, and ultimately eradicate populations.
The familiarity of these tactics makes it even more imperative for us to address them in the present. Recognizing the history of engineered starvation allows us to understand its implications better, not just for the past but also for current and future struggles against such heinous acts. The link between historical injustices and ongoing conflicts cannot be overlooked.
Yet, This is the First Settler-Colonial Genocide to Land Before an Intl Court
The fact that this case has reached an international court is a significant milestone in the fight for justice. It brings to light the systematic issues that have plagued marginalized communities for centuries. However, reaching an international court is just the beginning of a long and arduous process. There are many hurdles to overcome, and often, justice is served late, if at all.
Albanese’s statement emphasizes this unfortunate reality. The delayed justice often leaves communities in a perpetual state of suffering, as they wait for accountability that may never come. The international community needs to recognize that these issues are not isolated incidents but systemic failings that require urgent action.
But Even in This Case, Justice Will Be Served Late
The notion that justice will be served late is disheartening and reflects a broader trend in international law. Many communities endure decades, if not centuries, of waiting for justice. This delay allows the cycle of suffering to continue, impacting generations. It’s a reminder that while we may finally be acknowledging these wrongs, the path to justice remains fraught with obstacles.
Ultimately, discussions surrounding engineered starvation and settler-colonial genocides need to be more than just academic. They must translate into action, advocacy, and tangible change. As Francesca Albanese pointed out, the world is watching, and it’s time to hold those accountable who perpetrate these acts of violence and oppression. For communities affected by engineered starvation, the fight for justice is not just about acknowledgment — it’s a battle for survival.