Obama’s Role in Putin-Trump Scandal Exposed: Biden, Rice, and Monaco Involved!
Obama intelligence scandal, Trump-Russia investigation, 2016 election interference
—————–

Obama and the Intelligence Community Assessment: A Controversial Connection

In a recent tweet, journalist Paul Sperry has raised significant questions regarding the involvement of former President Barack Obama in the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) related to alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election. According to Sperry’s sources, Obama’s fingerprints are intricately linked to the post-2016 election ICA, which has been referred to as the "Putin-Trump frameup scandal." This revelation suggests a deeper connection between the White house and key figures in the intelligence community, specifically Susan Rice, Lisa Monaco, and Celeste Wallander, all of whom played pivotal roles during that turbulent period.

The implications of this claim are profound. The ICA, which was released in January 2017, concluded that Russia had interfered in the 2016 presidential election to benefit Donald trump. Many have scrutinized this assessment, arguing that it was politically motivated and aimed at undermining the legitimacy of Trump’s presidency. Sperry’s assertion that Obama was closely involved raises questions about the integrity of the assessment and the motivations behind it.

Key Figures in the Scandal

Sperry names several individuals who were reportedly involved in the ICA’s development, including Susan Rice, who served as the U.S. National Security Advisor, and Lisa Monaco, the former counterterrorism advisor. Celeste Wallander, who was the senior director for Russia and Eurasia at the National Security Council, also played a crucial role. These individuals, all closely associated with Obama’s administration, could potentially shed light on the administration’s intentions and actions surrounding the Russian interference narrative.

Moreover, the tweet indicates that President Joe Biden was also involved in briefings related to the ICA. This connection raises further questions about the continuity of the narrative surrounding Russian interference from the Obama administration into the Biden administration, and how it has influenced current political discourse.

Implications for Current Politics

The allegations presented by Sperry could have significant ramifications for both historical and current political landscapes. If proven true, these claims could lead to calls for investigations into the decisions made by the Obama administration and how those decisions have reverberated through American politics over the last several years. Additionally, this information could impact public perception of both Obama and Biden, particularly among those who view the intelligence community’s actions as politically charged.

Conclusion

As details continue to emerge regarding the connections between Obama, the ICA, and the ongoing narrative about Russian interference, the political implications could be substantial. Whether this leads to formal investigations or further political discourse remains to be seen. However, Sperry’s assertion that Obama’s involvement is significant is a crucial development in understanding the complexities of the 2016 election fallout and its lasting impact on American politics.

In an era where public trust in institutions is increasingly fragile, revelations like these highlight the importance of transparency and accountability among those in power. As more information comes to light, it is essential for the public to remain informed and engaged in the discussion surrounding these pivotal issues.

DEVELOPING: Sources tell me OBAMA’s fingerprints are all over Brennan’s post-2016 election Intelligence Community Assessment/Putin-Trump frameup scandal, which leads directly back to the White House and Susan Rice, Lisa Monaco,Celeste Wallander. Biden also was in on the briefings

— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 5, 2025

DEVELOPING: Sources tell me OBAMA’s fingerprints are all over Brennan’s post-2016 election Intelligence Community Assessment/Putin-Trump frameup scandal, which leads directly back to the White House and Susan Rice, Lisa Monaco,Celeste Wallander. Biden also was in on the briefings

In the ever-evolving landscape of American politics, the shadows of past events often loom large over current affairs. Recently, attention has been drawn to a controversial narrative involving former President Barack Obama and the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) conducted by John Brennan’s team following the 2016 presidential election. According to sources, Obama’s influence is deeply embedded in what some are calling a “Putin-Trump frameup scandal.” This intricate web of allegations includes key figures such as Susan Rice, Lisa Monaco, and Celeste Wallander, with President Joe Biden reportedly part of the briefings. So, what does this all mean, and why should we care?

Understanding the Intelligence Community Assessment

The Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released in January 2017 aimed to summarize the Russian government’s interference in the U.S. election. This document, which was co-authored by Brennan, highlighted the various tactics used by Russia, including cyber attacks and disinformation campaigns. The ICA was significant not just for its content but for the implications it had on the legitimacy of Donald Trump’s presidency. It painted a picture of collusion that many in the political arena continue to debate.

OBAMA’s fingerprints on the ICA

Now, back to the heart of the matter: sources are suggesting that Obama’s fingerprints are all over this scandal. But what does that mean? Essentially, it indicates that the former president may have had a significant role in shaping the narrative surrounding the ICA. This raises questions about the motivations behind the assessment and whether it was politically motivated. After all, if the ICA was designed to frame Trump as a puppet of Vladimir Putin, then it touches on serious implications regarding the integrity of political processes.

Who are the key players?

When diving into this narrative, it’s essential to understand the roles of the individuals mentioned. Susan Rice, who served as the National Security Adviser during Obama’s presidency, is often seen as a pivotal figure in the decision-making process regarding national security. Lisa Monaco, another key player, was the homeland security adviser and has been involved in numerous discussions during and after the election period. Celeste Wallander, who worked on Russian affairs, adds another layer to the puzzle. Together, these individuals formed a critical part of Obama’s inner circle, which raises eyebrows about the legitimacy of their actions and decisions during this politically charged time.

Biden’s involvement in the briefings

As if the plot couldn’t thicken any more, Joe Biden’s involvement in the briefings adds another dimension. Being the Vice President at the time, Biden was privy to crucial information and discussions that could have influenced the ICA’s direction. The implication here is that the current president may have been part of a broader scheme to undermine Trump’s presidency right from the get-go. This sheds light on the complexities of political allegiances and the lengths to which administrations might go to protect their narratives.

The fallout of the scandal

The accusations surrounding the ICA and the alleged involvement of Obama and his team have led to significant political discourse. Many critics argue that this could be a case of political retribution, where the previous administration aimed to delegitimize Trump’s presidency as a response to his outsider status. The ongoing discussions about the integrity of the election process and foreign interference remain critical issues in American politics, and this scandal only adds fuel to the already blazing fire.

Impact on public trust

One of the most alarming outcomes of this situation is the potential erosion of public trust in the government and the intelligence community. When high-ranking officials are accused of manipulating assessments for political gain, it raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability. Citizens rely on these institutions to provide unbiased information, and any hint of corruption can lead to widespread skepticism. This sentiment is echoed by many political analysts who warn that the repercussions of such scandals can affect voter confidence for years to come.

Media’s role in the narrative

The media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception of these events. Outlets that report on the alleged involvement of Obama and his team often face scrutiny themselves. Critics argue that the media can either perpetuate misinformation or help unveil the truth. The question remains: How can the public discern fact from fiction in such a convoluted narrative? As consumers of news, it’s essential to seek out multiple sources and critically analyze the information at hand.

What’s next?

The implications of this scandal are far-reaching, and it’s likely that we haven’t heard the last of it. As investigations unfold and more information comes to light, the political landscape may shift dramatically. Both sides of the aisle will undoubtedly use this narrative to their advantage, leading to more divisive debates and discussions. The challenge for the average American is to navigate this complex web of information while remaining informed and engaged.

Conclusion: The importance of vigilance

As we continue to unravel the layers of this scandal, it’s crucial to remain vigilant about the information we consume. Understanding the intricacies of political narratives, especially those involving figures like Obama and Biden, is essential. The stakes are high, and the implications could alter the course of future elections and governance in the U.S. Stay informed, question everything, and engage in discussions that matter. Politics isn’t just for politicians; it’s for all of us.

“`

This article is structured to provide a comprehensive overview of the allegations surrounding Obama and the Intelligence Community Assessment while ensuring it remains engaging and easy to read for the audience.