“NY Times’ Shocking Deal with Eugenicist Sparks Outrage Over Identity Politics!”
New York Times controversy, Columbia University data breach, far-right activism in journalism
—————–

Controversy Surrounding The New York Times and Zohran Mamdani’s Identity

In a recent development that has sparked heated discussions on social media, Ali Winston, a journalist, took to Twitter to reveal a concerning collaboration between The New York Times and Jordan ‘Cremieux’ Lasker. Winston alleges that Lasker, who has been identified as a eugenicist and far-right activist, provided hacked data from Columbia University for a story that casts doubt on the hyphenated identity of Zohran Mamdani, a prominent political figure.

The Allegations Against The New York Times

According to Winston, the primary narrative of the story revolves around Mamdani’s identity, which the media outlet seems to have scrutinized through a biased lens. By partnering with Lasker, an individual with a controversial background, The New York Times has raised questions about the integrity of its journalistic practices. The essence of Winston’s argument lies in the implication that this collaboration was not merely an innocent acquisition of information but rather a calculated move to undermine Mamdani’s credibility.

Who is Zohran Mamdani?

Zohran Mamdani is an influential figure known for his advocacy and political activism. He has been vocal about various social issues, particularly those affecting marginalized communities. His hyphenated identity symbolizes a blend of cultural backgrounds and experiences, which he has often highlighted in his work. The scrutiny surrounding this aspect of his identity by a major news outlet like The New York Times underscores the ongoing debate about identity politics and how they are represented in mainstream media.

The Role of Jordan ‘Cremieux’ Lasker

Jordan Lasker, described as a eugenicist and far-right activist, has a history of controversial statements and actions that align with extremist views. The partnership between Lasker and The New York Times raises ethical questions about journalistic integrity and the responsibility of media outlets to verify their sources and the motives behind them. Critics argue that by engaging with individuals like Lasker, The New York Times compromises its reputation and the trust of its readership.

Implications for Journalism

This incident has broader implications for journalism as a whole. It highlights the necessity for media organizations to critically evaluate their sources and the potential biases that may influence their reporting. The public’s trust in media can be easily eroded by such partnerships, especially when they involve individuals with dubious backgrounds.

In the age of misinformation, where the lines between credible journalism and sensationalism are often blurred, this situation serves as a crucial reminder of the standards that reputable news organizations are expected to uphold.

Conclusion

The unfolding controversy involving The New York Times, Jordan Lasker, and Zohran Mamdani serves as a pivotal moment in the ongoing discussions about media ethics, identity politics, and the responsibilities of journalists. As the story develops, it will be essential for media consumers to remain vigilant about the sources of information and the narratives being constructed about public figures, particularly those from marginalized communities. Engaging critically with news stories can empower readers to discern fact from bias, ultimately fostering a more informed society.

To be clear, the New York Times cut a deal with Jordan ‘Cremieux’ Lasker, an ALREADY IDENTIFIED EUGENICIST AND FAR RIGHT ACTIVIST, to get hacked data from Columbia for a story casting aspersions on Zohran Mamdani’s hyphenated identity.

THAT’s the true story https://t.co/KCww46EbYd pic.twitter.com/CjRAQVEJ8n

— Ali Winston (@awinston) July 4, 2025

To be clear, the New York Times cut a deal with Jordan ‘Cremieux’ Lasker

When the New York Times decides to publish a story, it typically garners a lot of attention. But what happens when the backdrop of that story is shrouded in controversy? Recently, there has been a buzz surrounding a deal that the New York Times allegedly made with Jordan ‘Cremieux’ Lasker, a figure described by some as an “ALREADY IDENTIFIED EUGENICIST AND FAR RIGHT ACTIVIST.” This situation raises several questions about journalistic ethics, the integrity of the sources used, and the implications of such alliances in the realm of journalism.

An Overview of the Allegations

The heart of the matter revolves around the claim that the New York Times obtained hacked data from Columbia University. This information was allegedly used to craft a narrative that casts aspersions on Zohran Mamdani’s hyphenated identity. For those unfamiliar, Mamdani is a political figure whose identity and background have been the subject of scrutiny and debate. The idea that a prominent news outlet would engage in such questionable partnerships to fuel a story is alarming.

Who is Jordan ‘Cremieux’ Lasker?

Understanding who Jordan ‘Cremieux’ Lasker is plays a crucial role in comprehending this entire saga. Lasker has been labeled as a far-right activist and has a history of involvement in eugenics discussions. Eugenics, a controversial and widely discredited movement that advocates for improving the genetic quality of the human population, has left a dark mark on history. The very association of a journalist or media outlet with such a figure raises red flags.

Why would a respected publication like the New York Times engage with someone with such a problematic background? This question lingers in the minds of many readers. It’s essential for readers to be aware of the sources behind a story, especially when those sources may have ulterior motives or a questionable ethical standing.

The Role of Hacked Data in Journalism

Now, let’s dive deeper into the issue of hacked data. In today’s digital age, information can be obtained through various means, some of which are legal and others that tread into murky waters. The act of using hacked data raises significant ethical questions. Is it acceptable for journalists to utilize information obtained through illegal means if it serves a greater purpose, such as exposing wrongdoing or corruption?

In the case of the New York Times and Lasker, the implications of using hacked data could tarnish the credibility of the publication. Many argue that the ends do not justify the means, and using illicitly obtained information can set a dangerous precedent for journalistic integrity. The public has a right to trust that the news they consume is based on reliable and ethically sourced information.

The Impact on Zohran Mamdani

At the center of this controversy is Zohran Mamdani, who has become a focal point in this unfolding narrative. Mamdani’s hyphenated identity is not just a matter of semantics; it represents a broader discussion about identity politics, privilege, and representation in the political realm. By casting doubt on his identity through potentially dubious means, the New York Times may have unwittingly contributed to a culture of mistrust and division.

Mamdani’s story is emblematic of the struggles faced by many individuals who navigate complex identities in a polarized society. When a major news outlet engages in tactics that undermine a person’s identity, it can have far-reaching implications, not just for Mamdani himself but for countless others who see their own experiences reflected in his narrative.

The Ethics of Journalism

The situation also brings to light the crucial topic of ethics in journalism. As consumers of news, we often place our trust in media organizations to deliver accurate, fair, and unbiased reporting. When a publication like the New York Times makes questionable decisions, it not only affects the individuals involved but can also erode public trust in journalism as a whole.

Ethics in journalism should prioritize truthfulness, transparency, and accountability. Engaging with figures who have controversial backgrounds, especially in the context of obtaining hacked data, raises serious concerns about the motivations behind such partnerships. Are media organizations more interested in sensationalism and clicks than in delivering responsible journalism? This question demands careful consideration.

The Broader Implications for Media

This controversy is not isolated to one publication or one individual. It reflects a broader trend in the media landscape where sensationalism and the pursuit of exclusive stories sometimes overshadow ethical considerations. As we navigate an era dominated by social media and the rapid dissemination of information, the need for responsible journalism has never been more critical.

The relationship between media outlets and figures like Lasker raises red flags about the future of journalism. Will we continue to see partnerships formed on shaky ethical grounds? Or will there be a collective movement toward prioritizing integrity over clicks? The choices made by influential media organizations will ultimately shape the landscape of journalism for years to come.

What Can Readers Do?

As readers and consumers of news, we have a role to play in holding media organizations accountable. It’s important to question the narratives presented to us and to seek out diverse perspectives. Engaging critically with the information we consume can help foster a more informed public.

Moreover, supporting journalism that prioritizes ethical practices and transparency can send a message to media organizations about the kind of reporting we value. The landscape of journalism is constantly evolving, and as consumers, we have the power to influence its direction.

Final Thoughts on the New York Times and Jordan Lasker

In a world where information is readily available at our fingertips, understanding the sources behind that information is paramount. The allegations surrounding the New York Times, Jordan ‘Cremieux’ Lasker, and Zohran Mamdani serve as a reminder of the complexities of modern journalism. As we continue to navigate these issues, let’s remain vigilant and demand accountability from those who shape our understanding of the world.

The discussion surrounding this controversy will likely continue to evolve, and as it does, it’s essential for us to stay informed and engaged. The implications of this situation extend beyond just one story; they touch on fundamental questions about identity, ethics, and the role of the media in our society.