“Is This the Most Ineffective republican Congress Ever? Patriots or Pretenders?”
Republican Congress performance, federal judges accountability, Senate Parliamentarian removal
—————–

In a recent tweet, Mike Engleman, a notable political commentator, expressed his discontent with the current Republican Congress, labeling it as “the most worthless Republican Congress in history.” His criticisms highlight a range of perceived failures that he believes undermine the party’s commitment to its constituents and core values. This summary examines Engleman’s assertions, providing context and implications of his statements.

### Critique of the Current Republican Congress

Engleman’s tweet brings to light a deep-seated frustration among some Republican constituents regarding the effectiveness of their elected officials. By asserting that the Republican Congress is ineffective, he implies a disconnect between the party’s promises and its actions. This sentiment resonates with many voters who expect their representatives to deliver on key issues and uphold conservative values.

### Failure to Codify DOGE Cuts

One of Engleman’s specific grievances is the Congress’s failure to codify the DOGE cuts. This reference likely pertains to significant budgetary cuts tied to certain programs or expenditures. The inability to formalize these cuts suggests a lack of decisive action, which could be interpreted as a failure to adhere to fiscal responsibility—a cornerstone of Republican ideology. Codifying these cuts would signal a commitment to reducing government spending and prioritizing the financial health of the nation, but the current Congress has not achieved this.

### Inaction Against Rogue Activist Federal Judges

Another point of contention raised by Engleman is the Congress’s inaction regarding what he terms “rogue activist federal judges.” This phrase typically refers to judges perceived to be making politically motivated decisions rather than adhering strictly to the law. Many conservatives argue that such judicial activism undermines the Constitution and the rule of law. Engleman’s critique suggests that the Republican Congress has not taken sufficient measures to address this issue, which could lead to long-term implications for the judicial landscape in the United States.

### The senate Parliamentarian Issue

Engleman also criticizes the Congress for not taking action against the Senate Parliamentarian. This official plays a crucial role in determining the procedural rules of the Senate, and some Republicans have expressed frustration with decisions that they believe hinder their legislative agenda. Engleman’s call for the firing of the Senate Parliamentarian indicates a desire for a more aggressive approach to governance, one that aligns with the party’s objectives. The lack of action in this regard could be viewed as a failure to capitalize on opportunities to advance their legislative goals.

### Patriotism and Congressional Duty

Finally, Engleman’s assertion that the Republican Congress is “NOT Patriots” raises questions about the definition of patriotism in the political sphere. For many, being a patriot involves not just a love for one’s country but also a commitment to upholding its values through active participation in governance. Engleman’s tweet suggests that the current Congress has strayed from this ideal, failing to act in ways that he believes would benefit the nation. This sentiment could reflect a broader disillusionment among the electorate, particularly those who feel that their representatives have not lived up to their promises.

### The Broader Political Landscape

Engleman’s criticisms are not made in isolation; they reflect a growing frustration among some Republican voters with their party’s leadership and legislative effectiveness. As the political landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial for elected officials to address these concerns. The backlash against perceived inaction could have consequences in upcoming elections, as constituents may seek alternative candidates who pledge to take decisive action on issues that matter to them.

### Conclusion

In summary, Mike Engleman’s recent tweet encapsulates a wave of frustration directed at the current Republican Congress. By highlighting failures such as the inability to codify budget cuts, inaction against activist judges, and the retention of the Senate Parliamentarian, Engleman paints a picture of a Congress that is failing to meet the expectations of its supporters. His assertion that they are “NOT Patriots” serves as a rallying cry for those who feel disillusioned and seek a more proactive and effective legislative body.

The implications of these criticisms extend beyond mere political rhetoric; they underscore the urgent need for Republican leaders to reevaluate their strategies and reconnect with their constituents. As the party navigates the complexities of governance, the voices of engaged voters like Engleman will undoubtedly play a pivotal role in shaping its future direction. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the Republican Congress will be judged not only by its legislative accomplishments but also by its ability to inspire confidence and uphold the principles that resonate with the American public.

The Republican Congress is the most worthless Republican Congress in history, in both houses.

They won’t codify the DOGE cuts.

They won’t do anything about the rogue activist federal judges!

They won’t fire the Senate Parliamentarian.

They basically are NOT Patriots!

— Mike Engleman (@RealHickory) June 26, 2025

RELATED VIDEO STORY: 2025-06-26 20:28:00

The Republican Congress is the most worthless Republican Congress in history, in both houses.

They won't codify the DOGE cuts.

They won't do anything about the rogue activist federal judges!

They won't fire the Senate Parliamentarian.

They basically are NOT Patriots!

The Republican Congress is the most worthless Republican Congress in history, in both houses.

When we think about the state of politics today, it’s hard not to notice the increasing frustration among constituents. Recently, Mike Engleman took to Twitter to voice his thoughts on the current state of the Republican Congress, calling it the most worthless in history. This bold claim resonates with many who feel disillusioned by their representatives. Let’s unpack this statement and explore the specific issues that have sparked such a harsh critique.

They won’t codify the DOGE cuts.

One of the significant criticisms revolves around the DOGE cuts. For those unfamiliar, these cuts refer to specific budgetary adjustments related to Dogecoin and cryptocurrency regulations. Many believe that the Republican Congress has a responsibility to codify these cuts, especially given the rising interest and investment in digital currencies.

But what does “codifying” really mean in this context? It’s not just about making sure some regulations are in place; it’s about creating a stable framework for individuals and businesses engaging with cryptocurrencies. By failing to act, critics argue that Congress is missing out on a critical opportunity to embrace innovation and support economic growth. It’s as if they are ignoring the changing landscape of finance altogether.

They won’t do anything about the rogue activist federal judges!

Another point of contention is the inaction regarding what some describe as rogue activist federal judges. This term typically refers to judges whose decisions are perceived to be politically motivated or outside the bounds of traditional interpretations of the law. Many believe these judges are undermining the Constitution and acting contrary to the will of the people. Yet, the Republican Congress has been criticized for not taking the necessary steps to address this issue.

It raises an important question: Why is the Congress hesitant to act on judicial appointments and the authority of federal judges? Are they afraid of backlash, or do they simply lack the will to confront a complicated issue? The silence on this matter can lead to feelings of frustration and helplessness among citizens who want to see their elected officials take a stand.

They won’t fire the Senate Parliamentarian.

Moreover, Engleman’s tweet points out the Congress’s reluctance to fire the Senate Parliamentarian. This position is critical in determining the rules and procedures that govern Senate operations. The Parliamentarian plays a key role in interpreting the rules of the Senate and advising on legislative procedures, which means their influence can significantly affect the legislative agenda.

Many feel that by not addressing this position, the Republican Congress is essentially giving away power that could be used to advance their political agenda. The inaction raises eyebrows: Are they simply complacent, or are they afraid to make a bold move that could backfire? This lack of decisiveness is frustrating for constituents who expect their representatives to take strong, clear actions.

They basically are NOT Patriots!

Lastly, let’s talk about the sentiment that the Republican Congress is not acting like patriots. Patriotism often involves standing up for the values and beliefs of a country, advocating for the people, and protecting the Constitution. When representatives appear to be more concerned with party politics than with the needs of their constituents, it’s easy to see why people would feel let down.

In the eyes of some voters, true patriotism means prioritizing the well-being of the nation over party loyalty. When members of Congress seem to be more focused on maintaining their positions or appeasing party leaders, it leads to a sense of betrayal among the electorate. This disillusionment could have long-term effects on voter turnout and trust in the political system.

The Bigger Picture: Understanding Political Discontent

Engleman’s tweet taps into a broader theme of political discontent that many Americans are feeling. The frustrations with the current Republican Congress are not isolated incidents; they reflect a growing sentiment that many politicians are not fulfilling their duties to the people. As citizens, we must ask ourselves: What does it mean to be represented? Are we seeing our values and concerns reflected in the actions (or inactions) of our elected officials?

Political engagement is crucial for a functioning democracy. When people feel that their voices aren’t being heard, it can lead to disengagement from the political process altogether. This can create a vicious cycle where lawmakers feel less accountable, and citizens feel less invested in the political landscape.

What Can Be Done?

So, what can we do about this situation? First, it’s essential to stay informed and engaged. Follow the actions of your representatives, and don’t hesitate to express your concerns. Whether through social media, town hall meetings, or direct communication, holding elected officials accountable is vital for ensuring they represent the interests of the people.

Additionally, supporting candidates who prioritize transparency and accountability can help shift the political landscape. Look for individuals who embody the principles of patriotism and are committed to serving the public good. Your vote matters, and it’s a powerful tool for change.

In Summary

The criticisms leveled at the Republican Congress by Mike Engleman reflect a broader discontent among voters. From the failure to codify the DOGE cuts to inaction on judicial appointments and the Senate Parliamentarian, many feel that their representatives are not acting in the best interests of the nation. It’s crucial for citizens to remain engaged, hold their elected officials accountable, and advocate for change that aligns with their values and needs. Ultimately, a thriving democracy relies on active participation and a commitment to the principles that unite us as a nation.