POTUS Blasts Media as “Scum” After Military Triumph: A Controversial Claim!
military aviation excellence, media criticism in politics, military operations 2025
—————–

Summary of President’s Remarks on Military Success and Media Criticism

In a recent tweet, President Joe Biden, known on social media as @POTUS, expressed his admiration for the capabilities of the U.S. military, praising what he described as an "unbelievable hit" executed by "genius pilots and genius people in the military." This statement underscores Biden’s support for the armed forces, emphasizing the skill and expertise involved in military operations. However, he also took the opportunity to criticize major media outlets, including CNN, MSNBC (referred to as MSDNC), and The New York Times, labeling them as "scum." This remark highlights the ongoing tension between the current administration and certain segments of the media.

Military Excellence and Leadership

President Biden’s comments reflect a broader narrative regarding the competence and dedication of the U.S. military. By referring to the personnel involved as "genius," he places emphasis on the training, strategic thinking, and execution skills required for successful military operations. Such a statement serves to boost morale among military ranks and reinforce public confidence in the armed forces’ capabilities. The president’s acknowledgment of military achievements aims to remind the public of the sacrifices made by service members and the importance of their missions.

Media Criticism

In tandem with his praise for military excellence, Biden’s sharp criticism of prominent media outlets illustrates a growing discontent with how certain news organizations report on government actions and military successes. By labeling CNN, MSDNC, and The New York Times as "scum," the president suggests that these outlets fail to give appropriate recognition to the military’s achievements, possibly skewing public perception. This reflects a broader trend in which political leaders express frustration with media narratives that they perceive as biased or unfair.

The Impact of Social Media on Political Discourse

Biden’s use of Twitter to deliver these remarks is significant, as social media platforms have become crucial for political leaders to communicate directly with the public. The immediacy and reach of platforms like Twitter allow politicians to bypass traditional media filters, presenting their views and responses in real-time. This has transformed the landscape of political communication, enabling leaders to foster direct engagement with constituents while also rallying support for their policies and actions.

Public Reaction and Implications

The public’s response to Biden’s comments is likely to be mixed. Supporters may appreciate his defense of the military and view his critique of the media as a necessary call for accountability and fairness in reporting. Conversely, critics may interpret his remarks as an attempt to deflect scrutiny from the administration’s challenges or as a reflection of a broader disdain for journalistic integrity. The polarized nature of contemporary media means that such statements can quickly become divisive.

Conclusion

President Biden’s tweet encapsulates a complex interplay between military appreciation and media criticism, reflecting the current political climate. By highlighting the accomplishments of military personnel while denouncing specific media outlets, Biden aims to reinforce public confidence in the armed forces and assert his administration’s narrative. As social media continues to shape political discourse, the implications of such remarks will resonate across various public spheres, influencing perceptions of military effectiveness and media accountability in the United States.

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.” pic.twitter.com/IrRhwgqQaK

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 25, 2025

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.”

In a recent statement that generated quite a buzz, .@POTUS praised the efforts of military pilots, describing their performance as “unbelievable.” The President highlighted the skill and genius behind military operations but also took a sharp jab at media outlets, calling out organizations like CNN, MSDNC, and The New York Times. This comment encapsulates a growing sentiment among many that media coverage often fails to give credit where it’s due, especially concerning military achievements.

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.”

The President’s remarks are not just a fleeting comment; they reflect an ongoing tension between the government and the media. For many, this highlights a broader issue of media bias and the struggle for accurate representation of military efforts. The term “scum,” while harsh, resonates with a portion of the public that feels disillusioned with mainstream media narratives. It’s crucial to delve deeper into this discussion, exploring both the merits of the military’s achievements and the role of media in shaping public perception.

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.”

Military operations require immense skill and training, and it’s no wonder the President commends the “genius pilots” involved. These individuals often operate under incredible pressure, making split-second decisions that can mean the difference between success and failure. When the media overlooks these feats, it can be disheartening for service members and their families who sacrifice so much. The President’s statement shines a light on the need for more balanced reporting that honors the dedication of our military forces.

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.”

Moreover, the President’s comments can be seen as a rallying cry for those who believe that the media should do a better job of acknowledging the hard work and achievements of military personnel. When we consider the risks they take and the skills they hone, it’s essential that their contributions are recognized, not just in passing but as a focal point of national pride. The President’s strong language underscores a passionate defense of those who serve, reminding us all of the importance of honoring their sacrifices.

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.”

In this digital age, where news travels fast, the way we consume media has transformed dramatically. Social media platforms like Twitter allow voices to be heard directly, bypassing traditional media filters. This shift has empowered many, including political figures, to speak openly about their views on media coverage. The President’s tweet is an example of how leaders are using these platforms to shape narratives and connect with the public beyond conventional press releases. It also raises questions about accountability in journalism and the responsibility of the media to provide fair and accurate coverage.

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.”

While some may agree with the President’s assessment of the media, others might argue that such language fosters division and undermines the credibility of essential journalistic work. Media plays a crucial role in a democratic society, providing checks and balances that hold power accountable. However, when citizens feel that coverage is biased or unfairly critical, it can lead to a breakdown of trust between the public and the press.

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.”

Looking at the broader landscape, the relationship between the military and the media has always been complicated. Historical events have shown that media coverage can shape public opinion about military actions, influencing everything from troop morale to public support for government initiatives. As the conversation continues, it’s vital to consider how we can improve this relationship, ensuring that our military heroes receive the recognition they deserve without compromising the integrity of the media.

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.”

Engagement in this dialogue is essential not just for those within the military community but for all citizens. Understanding the nuances of media coverage and military operations can lead to more informed opinions and discussions. It’s also a reminder of the importance of critical thinking when consuming news. As individuals, we have the power to seek out diverse perspectives and demand accountability in reporting. Being informed is a responsibility that comes with living in a democratic society.

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.”

As we reflect on the President’s statement, it’s essential to engage in constructive dialogue about the role of media in our society. By fostering discussions that bridge the gap between military achievements and media representation, we can work towards a more balanced understanding. Recognizing the dedication of our military personnel while also upholding the principles of responsible journalism is crucial for the health of our democracy.

.@POTUS: “This was an unbelievable hit by genius pilots and genius people in the military, and they’re not being given credit for it because we have scum… CNN is scum. MSDNC is scum. The New York Times is scum.”

In the end, the dialogue initiated by these powerful words is just the beginning. It’s a call to action for everyone involved in the conversation—whether you’re in the military, part of the media, or simply a concerned citizen. Let’s strive to elevate the discourse, recognizing the incredible work of our military while also holding the media accountable for their role in shaping public perception. Together, we can create a narrative that honors the truth and celebrates the heroes among us.