Judiciary’s Religious Bias Exposed: Wajahat and Sharmishtha vs Zubair and Nupur
Supreme Court bias, religious lens, judicial inequality

Legal discrimination, societal perceptions, religious influence

Judiciary reform, equality in law, unbiased justice delivery
—————–

In a recent tweet, Colonel Rohit Dev highlighted an issue that has been brought to light in the Indian judiciary system. He pointed out the disparities in how individuals are treated by the law based on their religion. The tweet mentioned two pairs of individuals, Wajahat and Sharmishtha, as well as Zubair and Nupur, who are perceived differently in the eyes of the law.

Colonel Rohit Dev’s tweet implied that there is a bias in the judiciary system that favors individuals of certain religions over others. He called for the Supreme Court to address this issue and ensure that justice is served impartially, without any religious bias. The tweet was directed towards key government officials, including the President, Prime Minister, Vice President, and Speaker of the Lok Sabha, urging them to take action.

This tweet raises important questions about the principles of justice and equality in India. It highlights the need for the judiciary to uphold these values and ensure that all individuals are treated fairly and equally under the law, regardless of their religious beliefs.

The call to “wake up” the Supreme Court serves as a reminder that the judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of all citizens. It is essential for the judiciary to remain independent and free from any external influences, including religious bias, in order to maintain the integrity of the legal system.

Colonel Rohit Dev’s tweet has sparked a conversation about the need for reforms in the Indian judiciary system to address issues of religious discrimination and ensure that justice is truly blind. It is a call to action for all stakeholders, including government officials, legal professionals, and civil society, to work together towards a more just and equitable society.

In conclusion, Colonel Rohit Dev’s tweet sheds light on a pressing issue in the Indian judiciary system and calls for urgent action to address religious bias and ensure equal treatment for all individuals under the law. It serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the principles of justice, fairness, and equality in a democratic society. The tweet serves as a wake-up call for the Supreme Court and other key stakeholders to work towards a more just and inclusive legal system for all citizens.

Wajahat and Sharmishtha are different in the eyes of Law

Zubair and Nupur are different in the eyes of Law

Seems Judiciary at times wears a Religious Lens in Bharat !

Supreme Court needs to be woken up@rashtrapatibhvn @PMOIndia @VPIndia @loksabhaspeaker @arjunrammeghwal… https://t.co/YJawn89Vm7

— Colonel Rohit Dev (RDX) (@RDXThinksThat) June 24, 2025

In today’s ever-evolving society, the judicial system plays a pivotal role in upholding justice and ensuring equality for all individuals. However, recent events have raised concerns about potential biases within the legal system, particularly when it comes to cases involving individuals from different religious backgrounds. The cases of Wajahat and Sharmishtha, as well as Zubair and Nupur, highlight the disparities that can exist within the eyes of the law.

Wajahat and Sharmishtha, two individuals from distinct religious backgrounds, found themselves entangled in a legal dispute that showcased the stark differences in how the law treats individuals based on their religious affiliations. Despite facing similar circumstances, the outcome of their cases differed significantly, raising questions about the impartiality of the judicial system.

Similarly, Zubair and Nupur, another pair of individuals from different religious backgrounds, experienced a similar discrepancy in the way they were treated by the legal system. Despite being involved in similar legal matters, the outcome of their cases was vastly different, further underscoring the need for a more equitable and unbiased judicial process.

The notion that the judiciary at times wears a religious lens in Bharat is a troubling revelation that calls into question the fundamental principles of justice and equality. The judiciary, as the guardian of the rule of law, is expected to uphold the principles of fairness and impartiality in its decisions. However, when cases are decided based on religious considerations rather than legal merit, it undermines the very foundation of the judicial system.

The Supreme Court, as the highest judicial authority in the land, plays a crucial role in ensuring that justice is served without prejudice or bias. It is imperative that the Supreme Court remains vigilant and attentive to instances where the judicial process may be influenced by religious considerations. By holding itself accountable and upholding the principles of justice and equality, the Supreme Court can set a precedent for fair and impartial legal proceedings.

In light of recent events, it is clear that the Supreme Court needs to be woken up to the realities of potential biases within the legal system. It is essential for the Supreme Court to actively address any instances of religious discrimination within the judiciary and take steps to ensure that justice is served equitably for all individuals, regardless of their religious background.

As concerned citizens, it is incumbent upon us to raise awareness about the importance of a fair and impartial judicial system. By advocating for transparency, accountability, and justice in the legal process, we can help ensure that the principles of equality and fairness are upheld in all legal proceedings. Together, we can work towards a more just and equitable society where the rule of law prevails over all else.

In conclusion, the cases of Wajahat and Sharmishtha, as well as Zubair and Nupur, serve as stark reminders of the importance of upholding justice and equality in the legal system. The judiciary must remain vigilant in ensuring that cases are decided based on legal merit rather than religious considerations. By holding itself accountable and striving for fairness and impartiality, the Supreme Court can set a precedent for a more just and equitable society. Let us continue to advocate for a legal system that upholds the principles of justice and equality for all individuals, regardless of their religious background.