“Senate Shocker: Elizabeth MacDonough Blocks trump‘s Bill, Demands 60 Votes!”
Defunding cities, Senate vote requirements, legislative challenges 2025
—————–

Breaking news: Senate Parliamentarian Strikes Down Key Provisions of Trump’s Legislation

In a significant turn of events, Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, appointed by former senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, has announced that large portions of former President Donald Trump’s proposed legislation, often referred to as the "Big Beautiful Bill," will not move forward without the support of 60 votes in the Senate. This decision has major implications for Trump’s policy agenda and the republican Party’s legislative strategy.

What Does This Mean for Trump’s Legislation?

The ruling by MacDonough means that several key provisions within Trump’s bill will not qualify for the reconciliation process, which allows certain legislation to pass with a simple majority (50+1 votes) rather than the traditional 60 votes typically required to overcome a filibuster in the Senate. The implications are profound, as it complicates the path forward for many of Trump’s proposals that have been central to his political platform.

Key Provisions Affected

Among the major provisions that have been struck down are:

• Defunding Sanctuary Cities: One of the most controversial aspects of Trump’s agenda has been his push to defund cities that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. This provision, aimed at bolstering border security and addressing illegal immigration, will now require bipartisan support in the Senate, making its passage much less likely.
• Reining in Activist Groups: The bill’s attempts to impose stricter regulations on activist organizations, often labeled as "liberal" or "leftist" by Trump and his supporters, are also affected. These measures aimed at curbing the influence of non-profit organizations that engage in political advocacy will now need a higher threshold of support to pass.
  

  Implications for the Republican Party
  

  This ruling comes at a critical juncture for the Republican Party as it seeks to implement Trump’s policy priorities while also navigating a divided Senate. The Senate, with its slim Democratic majority, poses a significant challenge for Republicans who wish to advance conservative policies without sufficient bipartisan support.

  The requirement for 60 votes may force the GOP to reconsider its strategy, potentially leading to negotiations with moderate Democrats. This situation could result in a more centrist approach to legislation, as lawmakers may need to find common ground on contentious issues to secure the necessary votes.

  The Role of the Senate Parliamentarian
  

  Elizabeth MacDonough’s role as Senate Parliamentarian is crucial in determining which aspects of legislation can proceed under reconciliation. Her decision is based on the "Byrd Rule," which prohibits provisions that are considered extraneous to the budget from being included in reconciliation bills. This rule is designed to ensure that budgetary legislation focuses strictly on fiscal matters, thereby limiting the scope of what can be passed with a simple majority.

  Her ruling highlights the power of the Parliamentarian in shaping legislative outcomes and underscores the complexities of the Senate’s rules, which often require strategic maneuvering and negotiation among lawmakers.

  Responses from Political Leaders
  

  Following the announcement, reactions from political leaders and analysts have been swift. Supporters of Trump have expressed frustration, arguing that the ruling undermines the will of the voters who supported the former president’s agenda. Critics, on the other hand, view this as a necessary check on what they consider extreme measures that could have far-reaching negative consequences for communities and the nation as a whole.

  The Path Forward
  

  In light of this ruling, the Republican leadership will need to regroup and assess its legislative priorities. Possible strategies may include:

• Bipartisan Negotiation: Engaging with moderate Democrats to craft legislation that incorporates broader concerns while still addressing key Republican priorities.
• Targeted Legislation: Focusing on smaller, more manageable pieces of legislation that have a greater chance of garnering bipartisan support, rather than attempting to pass sweeping reforms all at once.
• Public Advocacy: Mobilizing grassroots support to pressure Senate Democrats to support certain provisions that are popular among constituents.
  

  Conclusion: The Future of Trump’s Legislative Agenda
  

  The recent decision by Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough to strike down significant portions of Trump’s "Big Beautiful Bill" poses serious challenges for the former president’s legislative agenda. With the requirement for 60 votes in the Senate, many of Trump’s proposals face an uphill battle for approval. This ruling not only complicates the Republican Party’s strategy but also serves as a reminder of the intricate and often contentious nature of the legislative process in the U.S. Senate.

  As the political landscape continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how Republicans will navigate these challenges and whether they can successfully advocate for their proposed policies in a divided Senate. The coming months will be critical in shaping the future of Trump’s agenda and the broader political discourse in Washington.

BREAKING: Harry Reid appointee and Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough is STRIKING DOWN MASSIVE portions of Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill, requiring them to obtain 60 votes in the Senate instead of 50+1.

This INCLUDES:
– Defunding sanctuary cities
– Reining in activist… pic.twitter.com/4z1HHgSM53

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 23, 2025

BREAKING: Harry Reid Appointee and Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough Strikes Down Massive Portions of Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, appointed by Harry Reid, has decided to strike down significant portions of Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. This decision is noteworthy because it now requires the bill to obtain 60 votes in the Senate instead of the simple majority of 50 plus one. This change could fundamentally impact the legislative process and the future of various initiatives outlined in the bill. Let’s dive into what this means for both lawmakers and the American public.

Understanding the Role of the Senate Parliamentarian

The Senate Parliamentarian plays a crucial role in the legislative process. This unelected official interprets the rules of the Senate and advises on whether proposed legislation complies with those rules. MacDonough’s recent ruling has highlighted her influence, especially on contentious bills like Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. Her decision underscores the importance of bipartisan support in moving forward with significant policy changes. For those interested in the intricacies of Senate procedure, this resource provides a detailed overview of the Parliamentarian’s responsibilities.

The Implications of the Ruling

With MacDonough striking down portions of Trump’s bill, it raises the stakes for Republicans who had hoped to push through their agenda with a simple majority. Now, the need for 60 votes means that bipartisan cooperation is essential. This could lead to further negotiations and amendments to the bill, potentially watering down some of the more contentious elements. Political analysts are closely watching how this will play out, as the requirement for 60 votes can significantly alter the dynamics in the Senate.

What Portions of the Bill Were Affected?

MacDonough’s ruling affects several key provisions of Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. Among the most significant are:

• Defunding Sanctuary Cities: One of the major points of contention in the bill, this provision aimed to cut federal funding to cities that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. The ruling means that this controversial measure may struggle to gain the necessary support to pass.
• Reining in Activist Groups: Another aspect of the bill focused on limiting the influence of activist groups in political campaigns and funding. This has been a hot-button issue, and requiring 60 votes adds a layer of complexity to its potential implementation.

For a closer look at the implications of these provisions, Politico provides an in-depth analysis that sheds light on the political ramifications of these changes.

Why This Ruling Matters

The decision to require 60 votes is not just a procedural hurdle; it reflects broader issues within the current political climate. With a divided Senate, the need for bipartisan support often leads to compromises that dilute the original intent of proposed legislation. As lawmakers grapple with these new requirements, it raises questions about the feasibility of passing any major legislation without significant negotiations between both parties.

This ruling also sets a precedent for how future administrations may approach their legislative agendas. The importance of the Senate Parliamentarian’s role cannot be overstated, as it can influence not just this bill but also future efforts to pass significant reforms.

The Political Landscape Ahead

As we look ahead, the implications of this ruling will undoubtedly shape the political landscape. Republicans may need to reach across the aisle to garner the necessary votes, while Democrats will likely seize the opportunity to advocate for their priorities. The dynamic of cooperation versus partisanship will be put to the test.

Additionally, grassroots movements and public opinion will also play a vital role in influencing lawmakers’ decisions. Citizens are more politically engaged than ever, and their voices could sway the outcome of negotiations. The New York Times reports on how public sentiment is shifting, emphasizing the need for politicians to align their agendas with the desires of their constituents.

Moving Forward: What Lies Ahead?

As the dust settles on this major ruling, the path forward remains uncertain. Lawmakers will need to navigate the complexities of the Senate rules while attempting to pass legislation that addresses the needs of the American public. The requirement for 60 votes could lead to more moderate proposals that appeal to a broader audience, or it could stall progress altogether if partisan divisions deepen.

Moreover, the upcoming midterm elections will add another layer of urgency to the situation. Candidates will be closely monitored for their positions on key issues, including those impacted by Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. Voters will likely demand accountability and transparency as they assess their representatives’ ability to work together for the common good.

The Role of Public Engagement

In this climate, public engagement becomes paramount. Citizens have the power to influence their representatives through advocacy, activism, and voting. As discussions around the bill continue, it’s essential for individuals to stay informed and actively participate in the democratic process. Engaging with local representatives, attending town halls, and voicing opinions on social media can all contribute to shaping the legislative agenda.

For those interested in getting involved, Common Cause offers resources and guidance on how to advocate for political change effectively. By staying engaged, Americans can help ensure that their voices are heard in the halls of power.

Conclusion

Elizabeth MacDonough’s recent ruling represents a significant moment in the ongoing struggle over Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. The requirement for 60 votes adds a layer of complexity to the legislative process and underscores the importance of bipartisan cooperation. As we navigate this political landscape, the involvement of the public will be crucial in determining the future of crucial reforms. It’s a pivotal time for American democracy, and every voice counts.

“`